Respect Accredited Programmes: When Safeguarding and Delay Pull in Different Directions – No. 5 Barristers Chambers
‘For a parent involved in private children proceedings, a Cafcass section 7 report can appear decisive. Where it recommends no direct contact, the parent may understandably feel that the case has already been determined. H v R (Respect Programme or Equivalent Programme) [2026] EWFC 235 (B) is an important reminder that it has not. A section 7 recommendation is important professional evidence, but it remains evidence: the welfare decision belongs to the court, that responsibility cannot be abdicated. The case is particularly useful for practitioners dealing with findings of domestic abuse, recommendations for Respect-accredited perpetrator work and the difficult question of what should happen to a child’s relationship with a parent while such work is awaited.’
No. 5 Barristers Chambers, 24th August 2026
Source: www.no5.com

