‘It is well-known that there is no general common law duty on public authorities to carry out a consultation before making a decision. However, such a duty may arise if certain conditions are met. The High Court has recently had an opportunity to consider, and clarify, the precise circumstances under which such a duty arises. The case is R (Freedom from Torture and the Helen Bamber Foundation) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 1278 (Admin) (28 May 2026).’

Full Story

Administrative Court Blog, 5th June 2026

Source: administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com

‘The Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Kanabar v Kanabar [2026] EWCA Civ 582 determined that where party had died after issuing an appeal, but where no person was willing to become a personal representative to pursue the appeal on behalf of the estate, the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to FPR rule 30.10. This case provides a convenient opportunity to review the law and practice governing the situation where a party to divorce and financial remedy proceedings dies.’

Full Story

St John's Chambers, 2nd June 2026

Source: www.stjohnschambers.co.uk

‘On 8 May 2026, judgment was handed down in Quadrant-Brownswood Tenant Co-operative Ltd v Hitchens, an interesting possession claim in the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch.’

Full Story

Wilberforce Chambers, 11th May 2026

Source: www.wilberforce.co.uk

‘Two brothers have been jailed for killing a 16-year-old boy who was “in the wrong place at the wrong time” when he was hit while walking by a car being deliberately driven at a group on bikes.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 4th June 2026

Source: www.theguardian.com

‘In Kroupeeva v Kroupeev [2026] EWFC 85, James Ewins KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge found that an offshore discretionary trust (“the Rossini Trust”) and an offshore company (“Waterford”) held by it comprised a nuptial settlement capable of variation pursuant to s24(1)(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.’

Full Story

Wilberforce Chambers, 2nd June 2026

Source: www.wilberforce.co.uk

‘The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) has the power to make costs orders in tree preservation cases.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘The Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (ADASS) has recommended a cautious approach to implementation of this week’s Supreme Court ruling on deprivation of liberty and valid consent that overruled its 2014 judgment in Cheshire West.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘The High Court recently upheld a council’s refusal to take enforcement action where there was limited information about the character of a former coal yard use. Emma Dring looks at the lessons from the judgment.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 5th June 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘In this article, Rachel Murray-Smith, Conrad Turnock and Helen Arthur explain the significance of Crest Nicholson v Ardmore Ardmore [2026] EWHC 789 (TCC); [2026] EWHC 1069 (TCC), one of the first major decisions to consider the scope of building liability orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 and its impact on available routes to recovery.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

‘Delays in the county courts continue to fall – and sharply, according to the latest official figures from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 5th June 2026

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

‘Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects the right to liberty, and guarantees that nobody shall be “deprived” of their liberty unless certain conditions, set out in that Article, are met.

‘But what constitutes a “deprivation of liberty”? And in particular, when might someone who is said to lack capacity in domestic law be able to provide valid consent to what might otherwise constitute such a deprivation of liberty? These questions were tackled by the Supreme Court in the case of Re Attorney General for Northern Ireland’s Reference [2026] UKSC 16 (2 June 2026). The Court’s judgment is extremely important for social workers, mental health practitioners and medical personnel, as well as human rights scholars and advocates more generally.’

Full Story

Administrative Court Blog, 4th June 2026

Source: administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com

‘A judge has been removed from office for gross misconduct after he sent a “highly sexualised image” to a member of court staff.’

Full Story

The Independent, 4th June 2026

Source: www.independent.co.uk

‘The government will today publish a long-awaited family law consultation to strengthen the financial rights of unmarried couples if they split up.’

Full Story

Law Society Gazette, 4th June 2026

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

‘A new report authored by a leading academic has called for a wholly new approach to civil justice, condemning the succession of judge-led reviews that have tried to fix the systemic crisis.’

Full Story

Law Society Gazette, 4th June 2026

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

‘Williams J. The High Court considered the impact of a £28m confiscation order, disputed beneficial ownership claims, and criminally tainted assets in a restored financial remedy claim following the Supreme Court’s decision in Gohil (Appellant) v Gohil (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 61.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 4th June 2026

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

‘The family of a girl left brain-damaged at birth have agreed to accept £28m in damages after the NHS trust involved admitted that its mistakes led to the tragedy.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 4th June 2026

Source: www.theguardian.com

‘In BJS, a claim where a mother (the Second Claimant) witnessed her son (the First Claimant) suffer catastrophic injuries whilst an inpatient on a psychiatric ward, the High Court rejected an attempt to distinguish the Supreme Court’s decision in Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UK SC 1.’

Full Story

Quarterly Medical Law Review, 2nd June 2026

Source: 1corqmlr.com

‘The Home Office acted unlawfully when it changed its policy on allocation of asylum accommodation, failing to consult adequately and breaching both the public sector equality duty and the Tameside duty, the High Court has found.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 4th June 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk