The Demise of the `Voluntarist Exclusion Zone?’ – Industrial Law Journal

‘In Secretary of State for the Environment v PCSU [2024] UKSC 41the Supreme Court had to consider whether a trade union was entitled to sue on a provision derived from a collective agreement by virtue of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.1 The relevance of the presumption in s. 179 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to collectively agreed obligations which are incorporated in an employment contract was at the heart of the litigation. The Supreme Court found in favour of the trade union and this well prove beneficial to unions in future cases centring on third party rights. I would suggest that the decision also has significant implications for cases on incorporation of collectively agreed terms. It is also conceivable that the debate as to the merits of direct enforcement of collective agreements will be reopened.’

Full Story

Industrial Law Journal, 6th February 2025

Source: academic.oup.com

City trader jailed for Libor rigging says he was convicted in a ‘morality trial’ – The Guardian

‘The City trader jailed for Libor rigging in 2015 has said he believes he was convicted during a “morality trial” of bankers’ conduct, as he concluded his fight to clear his name at the UK’s highest court.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 27th March 2025

Source: www.theguardian.com

Economic Torts and Injured Feelings – Cambridge Law Journal

Posted March 27th, 2025 in appeals, damages, defamation, malicious falsehood, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘George v Cannell [2024 UKSC 19, [2024] 3 W.L.R. 153 is the first time in over a century that the UK’s highest court has substantively considered the economic tort of malicious falsehood. Sometimes known as injurious falsehood or slander of title, at common law this tort requires a falsehood, published maliciously which is calculated to produce, and does produce, “special damage” – namely, pecuniary loss.’

Full Story

Cambridge Law Journal, 7th January 2025

Source: www.cambridge.org

Adverse possession: applications by squatters to be registered as proprietor – Local Government Lawyer

‘The Supreme Court has used “pure grammar” to clarify the law relating to adverse possession. Nick McKnight considers the ruling.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 21st March 2025

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Rukhadze and others v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another [2025] UKSC 10 – Blackstone Chambers

‘The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in an important appeal concerning fiduciary duties. Three individuals who had been appointed by their principal to pursue a lucrative business opportunity decided instead to pursue it for their own benefit. They were found at trial to have breached fiduciary duties owed to their principal. On the taking of an account of profits, they were found to have earned around $170m from the pursuit of the business opportunity, and were ordered to account to the principal for the entire sum less a 25% equitable allowance to reflect the work they had done in generating it’

Full Story

Blackstone Chambers, 19th March 2025

Source: www.blackstonechambers.com

Adverse possession: applications by squatters to be registered as proprietor – Local Government Lawyer

‘In a leapfrog appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) the Supreme Court decided the question of how quickly an application, to be registered as the proprietor of a registered estate in land by way of adverse possession, needs to be made by a squatter, following their realisation that they do not in fact own the land which they have been possessing.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 21st March 2025

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Supreme Court trade mark decision will impact owner enforcement strategies – OUT-LAW.com

Posted March 19th, 2025 in appeals, enforcement, intellectual property, news, Supreme Court, trade marks by sally

‘An upcoming Supreme Court judgment could have a direct impact on enforcement strategies in the trade mark sphere, experts have said.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 18th March 2025

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Taxi firms crowdfund legal battle with Uber over VAT on fares in UK – The Guardian

Posted March 13th, 2025 in appeals, London, news, Supreme Court, taxation, taxis, VAT by sally

‘Two British taxi companies have launched a crowdfunding drive for the last leg of a lengthy legal battle with Uber that could result in higher cab fares.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 13th March 2025

Source: www.theguardian.com

Supreme Court rules Appellants were British all along – UK Human Rights Blog

‘N3 & ZA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] UKSC 6 concerned orders depriving two British people of their citizenship on national security grounds. The Defendant (initially) contended that to do so would not render them stateless, because they were dual British Bangladeshi nationals.’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 12th March 2025

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

Insolvency Appeals from this Winter period: a cold start but some good news for judgment creditors – 3 Paper Buildings

Posted March 6th, 2025 in appeals, bankruptcy, chambers articles, insolvency, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘Rebecca Farrell, specialist commercial and insolvency barrister at 3PB, has written an article exploring three recent Insolvency Appeals and their potential impact.’

Full Story

3 Paper Buildings, 28th February 2025

Source: www.3pb.co.uk

Case notes in passing – adverse possession rules, sale and rent-back, and the evidential burden in service charge disputes – Nearly Legal

‘The Supreme Court considered para 5(4) to Schedule 6 Land Registration Act 2002 on the requirements for an application for registered title through adverse possession of land adjoining the applicant’s land.’

Full Story

Nearly Legal, 2nd March 2025

Source: nearlylegal.co.uk

The Worst Secret Santa? Reflections on Hirachand v Hirachand and Anor [2024] UKSC 43 – St Philips Barristers

‘On 18 December 2024, the Supreme Court delivered its much-anticipated decision in Hirachand, holding that Conditional Fee Agreement (“CFA”) success fees cannot be recovered as part of an applicant’s financial needs under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (“the 1975 Act”). Although the decision has now provided much-needed certainty in this area, to say it has had a mixed reception amongst Chancery practitioners would be an understatement. This note will provide an overview of the decision and its background as well as some reflections on its implications for future litigants.’

Full Story

St Philips Barristers, 30th January 2025

Source: st-philips.com

El-Khouri [2025]: Extradition Offences and the Rule of Double Criminality – 2 Hare Court

Posted February 26th, 2025 in chambers articles, extradition, insider dealing, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court (“UKSC”) handed down its judgment in El-Khouri v Government of the United States of America [2025] UKSC 3, providing important clarification on the concept of an “extradition offence” and the operation of the “double criminality’ rule.”‘

Full Story

2 Hare Court, 19th February 2025

Source: www.2harecourt.com

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in landmark Section 423 Insolvency Act case – OUT-LAW.com

Posted February 24th, 2025 in debts, insolvency, news, statutory interpretation, Supreme Court, valuation by sally

‘A new ruling by the UK Supreme Court confirms that creditors can obtain remedies if transactions entered into at an undervalue have the purpose and effect of prejudicing claims the creditors have against the debtor – even if the debtor has not personally agreed those transactions.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 20th February 2025

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Supreme Court’s judgment over Insolvency Act ‘welcome confirmation’ – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted February 21st, 2025 in appeals, debts, insolvency, news, statutory interpretation, Supreme Court by sally

‘A Supreme Court judgment centred on the construction of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986, which provides remedies to creditors where a debtor takes steps to defeat or prejudice their claims, “should be welcomed by all creditors”, solicitors say.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 20th February 2025

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Supreme court judges reject Reeves’ motor finance intervention – The Guardian

‘Rachel Reeves was dealt a fresh blow on Monday when her attempt to intervene in a high-profile supreme court case and curb a potential £44bn bill for lenders caught up in the car loan commissions scandal was rejected. Judges at the supreme court rejected the chancellor’s application, lodged last month, in which she urged them to avoid handing “windfall” compensation to borrowers harmed by allegedly secret commission payouts to car dealers that arranged the loans.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 17th February 2025

Source: www.theguardian.com

Supreme Court quashes extradition of trader in ‘landmark’ judgment – Law Society’s Gazette

‘The extradition to the US of a man accused of insider trading has been quashed by the Supreme Court in a “landmark judgment” after the court itself granted permission to appeal.The appeal centred on the definition of an “extradition offence” and the operation of the double criminality rule in section 137 of the Extradition Act 2003.’

Full Story

Law Society's Gazette, 13th February 2025

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Fifteen years on – The impact of Radmacher on UK prenups and divorces – Kingsley Napley Family Law Blog

Posted February 12th, 2025 in divorce, news, prenuptial agreements, Supreme Court by sally

‘It is now some fifteen years since the UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in the case of Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 on the use and effectiveness of prenuptial agreements. In doing so it moved the emphasis on to holding the parties to their bargain when setting out the principle that “the court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement.”‘

Full Story

Kingsley Napley Family Law Blog, 5th February 2025

Source: www.kingsleynapley.co.uk

Supreme Court to hear key case next week on ‘appropriate assessment’ and subsequent approvals – Local Government Lawyer

‘The Supreme Court will next week consider whether Regulation 63 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (“the Habitats Regulations”) require an “appropriate assessment” to be undertaken for subsequent approvals after the grant of outline planning permission at a further consent stage, i.e. at the approval of reserved matters and discharge of conditions stages.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 10th February 2025

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Nicholas Reed Langen: The Use and Abuse of Citizenship Deprivation: SSHD v Kolicaj UK Constitutional Law Association

Posted February 6th, 2025 in citizenship, ministers' powers and duties, news, Supreme Court by sally

‘Any British citizen that happens to hold citizenship for another country could find themselves in an invidious position. If the Home Secretary decides that it would be “conducive to the public good”, they can single-handedly strip a person of their citizenship, and with it, their right to remain in the country. So long as the deprivation would not make them stateless, the law offers few protections beyond a limited right of appeal and the need for the Home Secretary to have some reasons.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 6th February 2025

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org