Charging decision in relation to allegations that a police officer passed confidential information to a journalist about Operation Weeting – Crown Prosecution Service

“Statement from Alison Levitt QC, Principal Legal Advisor to the Director of Public Prosecutions:

On the 2 April 2012 the Crown Prosecution Service received a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police Service requesting charging advice in relation to two suspects. The first is a serving Metropolitan Police Officer in the Operation Weeting team whose name is not in the public domain. He is currently suspended. The second suspect is Amelia Hill, a journalist who writes for The Guardian newspaper.”

Full press release

Crown Prosecution Service, 29th May 2012

Source: www.cps.gov.uk

Civil cases to hear secret evidence but not inquests – Daily Telegraph

“Evidence deemed sensitive to national security by judges will be heard behind closed doors in a controversial move that will make legal history. The Justice Secretary will make a ‘substantial’ climbdown, however, by excluding inquests from the new powers following widespread concerns about secret justice.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 29th May 2012

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

A secret justice climb down? Perhaps not – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted May 21st, 2012 in bills, closed material, judiciary, news, private hearings, public interest by sally

“It appears that the Government has climbed down, in part, from some of its controversial secret justice proposals. According to the Telegraph, the Justice and Security Bill, which will be published this week, will include a provision whereby judges, not the Government, has the final say on whether a Closed Material Procedure (CMP) is used. Moreover, CMPs will be restricted to ‘national security cases’ rather than any case ‘in the public interest’.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 21st May 2012

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Judges to decide on secret evidence as Clarke pushes ahead with plans – Daily Telegraph

Posted May 21st, 2012 in bills, closed material, judiciary, news, private hearings, public interest by sally

“Judges will decide whether national security evidence can be heard in secret in a partial climbdown on plans to be unveiled by Kenneth Clarke this week.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 20th May 2012

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Dale Farm council urged to drop private prosecution of protesters – The Guardian

“A council is seeking to privately prosecute two dozen protesters for obstructing bailiffs during the eviction of Dale Farm, after police and the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to charge them.”

Full story

The Guardian, 18th May 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Court of Appeal allows demolition of “derelict” building – OUT-LAW.com

Posted May 14th, 2012 in appeals, local government, news, planning, public interest by sally

“The Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of Stockton Council to allow it to proceed with the demolition of Billington House, the former headquarters of chemical company ICI, and now a derelict office block.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 11th May 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

The vexatious allegation – One Inner Temple Lane

“False reports to the police are rare. Most complaints are truthful and accurate and amount to a proper grievance. However, there are some that are either false or wild exaggerations of the truth. There are yet more that may well be true but amount only to such a trivial complaint that a reasonable person would not think it worthy of the attention of the authorities. The subject of such reporting has hitherto had limited redress in law. Unless the Crown were wiling to prosecute the accuser the chances of retribution were small. The case of Waxman has brought to notice an area of civil redress.”

Full story

One Inner Temple Lane, 1st May 2012

Source: www.1itl.com

UK framework on IP rated one of the worst for serving consumer interests – OUT-LAW.com

“The UK’s intellectual property (IP) framework is one of the worst in the world in terms of serving the interests of the public, a new report has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 27th April 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

Bar Standards Board’s ‘research’ is crass and deeply flawed – The Guardian

“Barristers think higher court advocates aren’t much cop. Let’s not pretend that’s a reliable indicator of their quality.”

Full story

The Guardian, 23rd April 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Ofcom to probe Sky email hacking – BBC News

Posted April 23rd, 2012 in electronic mail, interception, media, news, privacy, public interest by sally

“Ofcom has launched an investigation into the hacking of private email accounts by Sky News.”

Full story

BBC News, 23rd April 2012

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

DPP launches public consultation on cases affecting the media – Crown Prosecution Service

“Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), has today published interim guidelines on the approach prosecutors should take when assessing the public interest in cases affecting the media.”

Full story

Crown Prosecution Service, 18th April 2012

Source: www.cps.gov.uk

Journalists ‘should have to argue public interest for unlawful methods in court’ – The Guardian

Posted April 12th, 2012 in media, news, public interest by sally

“Journalists should appear before a court of law to make a public interest defence for stories obtained by unlawful newsgathering techniques, the information commissioner has said.”

Full story

The Guardian, 12th April 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Clarification of the ‘public interest’ defence is badly needed – The Guardian

Posted April 10th, 2012 in defences, electronic mail, interception, media, news, privacy, public interest by sally

“Sky News’s decision to approve the hacking of emails belonging to John Darwin, the once-missing, presumed-dead ‘canoe man’, can be argued to be one of those finely balanced editorial decisions. The public interest argument runs fairly straightforwardly, after all. Darwin pleaded guilty to deception in March 2008 – you will recall he went out to sea in a canoe and somehow paddled his way from the north-east to the Panama canal, suggesting he was not so dead after all. But his wife, Anne, was going to trial – a life insurance policy had been cashed in by her – and it was at that point Sky’s journalist, Gerard Tubb, was given the green light to try to access John Darwin’s email communications. As he did so, he uncovered information that made it clear that Anne Darwin was in on the plot, and having shared this with Cleveland police, the broadcaster believes it helped secure her conviction and produced a very detailed post-conviction backgrounder.”

Full story

The Guardian, 8th April 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Public interest ‘high’ in publishing NHS risk register – BBC News

Posted April 10th, 2012 in freedom of information, health, news, public interest, tribunals by sally

“The public interest in publishing a risk assessment of the NHS overhaul in England is ‘very high, if not exceptional’, a tribunal has ruled.”

Full story

BBC News, 5th April 2012

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Bar Council Calls for Government to Protect Civil Liberties – The Bar Council

Posted April 5th, 2012 in human rights, investigatory powers, news, privilege, public interest by sally

“The Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has called for the Government to amend further the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) to protect civil liberties and open justice.”

Full story

The Bar Council, 4th April 2012

Source: www.barcouncil.org.uk

Daniel Bartlam – was the court right to lift his anonymity? – The Guardian

Posted April 5th, 2012 in anonymity, murder, news, public interest, young offenders by sally

“The 15-year-old who killed his mother was named to deter similar terrible crimes. But is such publicity counterproductive?”

Full story

The Guardian, 5th April 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

There but for the grace of God? : a consideration of recent fatal road traffic cases – Zenith Chambers

“Since 18th August 2008 there has been an offence on the statute books which effectively criminalises what in many cases amount to little more than minor errors of judgement; this offence carries with it the prospect of the alleged offender being sent to prison for anything up to five years. Section 2B of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (inserted by the Road Safety Act 2006) introduced motorists to the offence of causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving. It was undoubtedly enacted because of increased public (and tabloid) disquiet about the previous alternative to the more serious offence of causing death by dangerous driving (s1 RTA 1988); this was, of course, the much less serious charge of careless and inconsiderate driving (s3 RTA 1988), which carried only a financial penalty and a discretionary disqualification from driving. Since the implementation of s2B RTA 1988, however, the prosecuting authorities have become increasingly keen to charge drivers with this offence; indeed, matters now appear to have reached the point where their default position seems to be that simply because a fatality arises from a road traffic collision, then a prosecution must follow, irrespective of where the fault for the collision lies. The exercise of any proper judgement as to whether it is in the public interest to pursue a prosecution in
many such cases seems to have completely evaporated.”

Full story (PDF)

Zenith Chambers, 27th March 2012

Source: www.zenithchambers.co.uk

Kettling: Can a public interest motive justify a deprivation of liberty or not? – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted April 2nd, 2012 in demonstrations, human rights, news, police, public interest, public order by sally

“The Grand Chamber of the ECtHR recently tackled the question of whether the police tactic of ‘kettling’ (verb, UK, of the police – to contain demonstrators in a confined area) amounted to a deprivation of the liberty of four applicants within the meaning of Article 5(1) of the ECHR.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 2nd April 2012

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Search engines should face legal requirement to censor privacy-invasive material unless they act voluntarily, MPs say – OUT-LAW.com

Posted March 28th, 2012 in complaints, injunctions, internet, media, news, ombudsmen, privacy, public interest by sally

“New legislation should be introduced to force search engines to delete privacy-invasive material from search indexes if the companies do not take action voluntarily, a committee of MPs has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 27th March 2012

Source: www.out-law.com

Privacy injunctions to get clean bill of health from parliament – The Guardian

Posted March 26th, 2012 in injunctions, media, news, parliamentary privilege, privacy, public interest by sally

“High court privacy injunctions have been given a clean bill of health by a special committee of MPs and peers which were set up in the fallout of the Ryan Giggs gagging order.”

Full story

The Guardian, 23rd March 2012

Source: www.guardian.co.uk