‘Sir Brian Leveson, President of the Queen’s Bench Division gave the 13th Annual Isaiah Berlin Lecture in London on 12 November 2015.’
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, 13th November 2015
Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk
‘Harbour Lecture by Lord Justice Jackson: Confronting Costs Management.’
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, 14th May 2015
Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk
The Supreme Court in the United Kingdom Constitution (PDF)
Lecture by Lady Hale
The Bryce Lecture, 5th February 2015
Source: www.supremecourt.uk
‘Human Rights and the Common Law – Where Next after Kennedy v the Charity Commission? The Jan Grodecki Lecture 2014 by Michael Tugendhat at the University of Leicester School of Law on 23rd October, 2014.’
University of Leicester, 23rd October 2014
Source: www.le.ac.uk
‘Professor Gillon would argue that the judgment in the case of a patient in prolonged and incurable “minimally conscious state”, that she must continue to be kept alive with artificial nutrition and hydration, despite the evidence from her loved ones that she would have rejected such treatment, manifests an excessive concern for the “sanctity of life” and inadequate concern both for patients’ prior views values and autonomy and about the use of scarce health service resources on patients whose loved ones reliably report that they would have rejected those resources had they been able to do so.’
Gresham College, 12th February 2014
Source: www.gresham.ac.uk
The British and Europe (PDF)
Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court
Cambridge Freshfields Annual Law Lecture, 12th February 2014
Source: www.supremecourt.uk
Decision-making in the UK’s top court
Professor Alan Paterson OBE
Second annual BAILII Lecture, 9th December 2013
Source: www.bailii.org
What’s the point of human rights? (PDF)
Lady Hale
Warwick Law Lecture, 28th November 2013
Source: www.supremecourt.gov.uk
“The purpose of this lecture is to attempt to look at the big themes in healthcare law in order to understand how the legal structure of the NHS has changed as a result of the passing and almost complete implementation of the Health and Social Care Act 2012. Inevitably there are other factors that change the NHS at the same time and I will attempt to weave in these other factors at an appropriate place.”
No. 5 Chambers, 26th June 2013
Source: www.no5.com
“Marriage from the eighteenth century to the twenty-first century”
Some reflections on Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee (1866) LR 1 P & D 130
By Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division
On Thursday 25th April 2013, 6pm
The Common Room of The Law Society, 113 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1PL
Tickets cost £5, Students free
To book your place visit www.iclr.co.uk/annual-lectures
Legal Academics: Forgotten Players or Interlopers? (PDF)
The Hon. Mr Justice Beatson
Inner Temple Reader’s Lecture Series, November 2012
Source: www.innertemple.org.uk
“Positive discrimination is the only thing likely to significantly accelerate the rate of progress towards a more diverse judiciary, a Supreme Court judge has suggested.”
Law Society’s Gazette, 17th November 2012
Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk
“Former lord chancellor suggests the human rights court will be the architect of its own demise as the former president recalls its achievements.”
The Guardian, 14th November 2012
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
“Slobodan Milošević died a few months before the end of his trial. There were no closing arguments and there was no judgment by the judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia – the ICTY. Sir Geoffrey Nice had been preparing closing arguments as the case proceeded and will explain what some of them were.”
Lecture by Sir Geoffrey Nice
Gresham College, 2nd October 2012
Source: www.gresham.ac.uk
“In the last twenty years several international courts have been established to try crimes committed in armed conflicts. Public expectation of what these courts may achieve is high; but are the courts living up to that expectation? Is the public expectation realistic and part of a liberal tradition; may it be seen as ‘judicial romantic’, according to courts capabilities they can never have? Are the courts always bound to be tainted by political influence that makes it probable they will ultimately fail? What sense can be made of the permanent International Criminal Court – the ICC – when Russia, China and the USA decline to accept its jurisdiction for their own citizens but can, as permanent members of the Security Council of the UN, refer individuals from other non-member states to the ICC for trial? And would it matter if the ICC failed? Has enough already been done to chart a way ahead that will allow the law a proper role in the service of countries, or communities in countries, at war? In any event, are war crimes trials the best partner of politics in the search for peace? Are there times when it may be better to let history go in the interests of a better safer future? This is a part of Sir Geoffrey Nice’s 2012/13 series of lectures as Gresham Professor of Law.”
Lecture by Sir Geoffrey Nice
Gresham College, 12th September 2012
Source: www.gresham.ac.uk
“There is general agreement among non-family lawyers that family procedures should be more transparent. But exactly what role should the media play in matters of family justice?”
Lecture by The Rt Hon Sir Nicholas Wall
Gresham College, 28th June 2012
Source: www.gresham.ac.uk
“Michael Todd QC, the Chairman of the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, will today address an invited audience in Grand Court Number One of the Cayman Islands on ‘Ethics and the Rule of Law.’ ”
The Bar Council, 22nd March 2012
Source: www.barcouncil.org.uk
© Inner Temple Library 2024