Regina v Vasili – WLR Daily

Posted February 28th, 2011 in appeals, law reports, offensive weapons by sally

Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58

“If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon.”

WLR Daily, 24th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 26th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Ahmed & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 184 (25 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Ricky Edwards-Tubb v JD Wetherspoon Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 136 (25 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Aviva Insurance Ltd v Brown [2011] EWHC 362 (QB) (25 February 2011)

Locke v Stuart & Anor [2011] EWHC 399 (QB) (25 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Moneim v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 327 (Admin) (25 February 2011)

Nagiub v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 366 (Admin) (25 February 2011)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corp & Ors v Stepanovs [2011] EWHC 333 (Comm) (25 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 25th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Thompson, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 102 (03 February 2011)

Moss, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 252 (1 February 2011)

Thornley, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 153 (26 January 2011)

Webb, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 152 (26 January 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Ceva Logistics Ltd v Lynch & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 188 (25 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Francotyp-Postalia Ltd v Whitehead & Ors [2011] EWHC 367 (Ch) (25 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Ahmad v London Borough of Brent & Ors [2011] EWHC 378 (QB) (25 February 2011)

Hook v British Airways Plc [2011] EWHC 379 (QB) (25 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

BB, R (on the application of) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission & Anor [2011] EWHC 336 (Admin) (25 February 2011)

Plunkett, R (on the application of) v Sefton Metropolitan District Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 368 (Admin) (25 February 2011)

High Court (Patents Court)

Moelnlycke Health Care AB v Brightwake Ltd (t/a Advancis Medical) [2011] EWHC 376 (Pat) (25 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor; Taylor v Stoutt and others – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2011 in costs, disclosure, law reports, privilege, solicitors by sally

CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor; Taylor v Stoutt and others [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 57

“There was no difference in principle between the ambit of a solicitor’s duty to the court in relation to the conduct and supervision of disclosure of documents and the conduct and supervision of any redaction of disclosable doccuments prior to inspection.”

WLR Daily, 24th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2011 in appeals, immigration, law reports by sally

R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56

“It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal.”

WLR Daily, 24th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

R (Mirza and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2011 in appeals, immigration, law reports by sally

R (Mirza and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 159; [2011] WLR (D) 55

“The Home Secretary, when refusing to extend a foreign national’s leave to remain in the United Kingdom, ought at the same time or promptly thereafter make a removal decision which, if adverse, would enable the foreign national to appeal without breaking the law by overstaying.”

WLR Daily, 24th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Vasili – WLR Daily

Posted February 25th, 2011 in law reports, offensive weapons by sally

Regina v Vasili [2011] WLR (D) 58

“If an object had all the characteristics of a flick knife, it would therefore be considered an offensive weapon per se: the fact that the same object functioned also as a lighter did not stop it being an offensive weapon.”

WLR Daily, 24th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary would be removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 24th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Austin & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 345 (24 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Seeff & Anor v Dinh Nam Ho & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 186 (24 February 2011)

Sita UK Ltd. v Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority [2011] EWCA Civ 156 (24 February 2011)

British Airways Plc v Mak & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 184 (24 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Phethean- Hubble v Coles [2011] EWHC 363 (QB) (24 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Choy v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 365 (Admin) (24 February 2011)

Popa v Regional Court In Plzen Mestro, Czech Republic [2011] EWHC 329 (Admin) (24 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 24th, 2011 in law reports by sally

High Court (Chancery Division)

Kingspan Group Plc & Anor v Rockwool Ltd [2011] EWHC 250 (Ch) (21 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Slavik, R (on the application of) v District Court of Nitra, Slovak Republic [2011] EWHC 265 (Admin) (03 February 2011)

Simpson v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2011] EWHC 283 (Admin) (18 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 24th, 2011 in law reports by sally

Supreme Court

London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011)

Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011)

Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011)

Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23 February 2011)

007 Stratford Taxis Ltd., R (on the application of) v Stratford On Avon District Council [2011] EWCA Civ 160 (23 February 2011)

Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 163 (23 February 2011)

Mirza & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 159 (23 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

CMCS Common Market Commercial Services AVV v Taylor [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch) (23 February 2011)

Irwin v Wilson & Ors [2011] EWHC 326 (Ch) (23 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Mugweni v NHS London [2011] EWHC 334 (QB) (23 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Western Power Distribution Investments Ltd. v Cardiff County Council [2011] EWHC 300 (Admin) (23 February 2011)

SM, R (on the application of) v FM [2011] EWHC 338 (Admin) (23 February 2011)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Melinda Holdings SA v Hellenic Mutual War Risks Association (Bermuda) Ltd [2011] EWHC 181 (Comm) (18 February 2011)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Lansdowne House (St George’s Hill) Ltd v Liberty Syndicate Management Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 332 (TCC) (23 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

Baxter v Mannion – WLR Daily

Posted February 24th, 2011 in appeals, land registration, law reports, limitations, mistake by sally

Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120; [2011] WLR (D) 54

“Where a registrar of the Land Registry found that a person who had been registered as the proprietor of land as adverse possessor had not in fact been in adverse possession of the land, he could exercise his power under paragraph 5(a) of Schedule 4 to the Land Registration Act 2002 to alter the register for the purpose of correcting a mistake, so as to restore the original proprietor.”

WLR Daily, 23rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Ineos Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, other party) – WLR Daily

Posted February 24th, 2011 in burden of proof, EC law, law reports, trade marks by sally

Ineos Healthcare Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, other party) (Case T-222/09); [2011] WLR (D) 53

“In opposition proceedings against registration of a trade mark pursuant to article 42 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, the opposing party was not obliged to adduce evidence in support of the opposition. Whilst in relation to proceedings relating to relative grounds for refusal the Board of Appeal of the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) could take into account facts which were likely to be known by anyone or which might be learned from generally accessible sources, it was not, however, entitled to exceed the conditions governing examination set out in article 74 of Regulation 40/94.”

WLR Daily, 23rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina v Forsyth; Regina v Mabey – WLR Daily

Regina v Forsyth; Regina v Mabey [2011] UKSC 9; [2011] WLR (D) 52

“The power under section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 to create a criminal offence by Order in Council so as to enforce a United Nations Security Council Resolution was not restricted to use at or about the same time as when the Resolution had been passed.”

WLR Daily, 23rd February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note that once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 23rd, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 131 (22 February 2011)

Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120 (22 February 2011)

PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 132 (22 February 2011)

Goad v Butcher & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 158 (22 February 2011)

Bateman, R (on the application of) v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2011] EWCA Civ 157 (22 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2011] EWHC 291 (Admin) (22 February 2011)

High Court (Family Division)

Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam) (15 October 2010)

Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 3091 (Fam) (03 December 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Cecil and others v Bayat and others – WLR Daily

Cecil and others v Bayat and others [2011] EWCA Civ 135; [2011] WLR (D) 51

“The claimants in a proposed action for breach of contract and damages were not entitled unilaterally to decide to postpone service of their claim form out of the jurisdiction under CPR 7.6(1). They should have served the form in the period of its initial validity, and, if they were not in a financial position to proceed immediately with the claim, they should have issued an application seeking a stay, or an extension of the time for procedural steps to be taken. The fact that the claimants spent the period of initial validity seeking a conditional fee agreement and after-the-event insurance was not a valid reason for their not having served the claim form, since their funds were sufficient to serve the claim even if they were not then in a position to fund the entire course of the litigation.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Werynski v Mediatel 4B spólka z o o – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2011 in costs, EC law, jurisdiction, law reports, news, witnesses by sally

Werynski v Mediatel 4B spólka z o o (Case C-283/09); [2011] WLR (D) 50

“In respect of acts which had been adopted in the field of Title IV of the EC Treaty, since December 1 2009 the Court of Justice of the European Union has had jurisdiction to hear and determine a reference for a preliminary ruling from a court against whose decision there was a judicial remedy under national law even where the reference was lodged prior to that date. In determining whether the question referred to the Court of Justice was necessary to enable the referring court to ‘give judgment’ pursuant to article 267FEU of the FEU Treaty, ‘give judgment’ referred to the entire process of creating the judgment, including all issues relating to the responsibility for the costs of proceedings. Where the examination of a witness by a court was at issue there was a direct connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the performance by the referring court of a judicial function. A requested court was not entitled pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the member states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 174, p 1), to make the examination of a witness conditional on prior payment of an advance from the requesting court covering his witness expense and there was no obligation upon the requesting court to pay such an advance nor was the requesting court obliged to reimburse the expenses paid to the witness examined.”

WLR Daily, 21st February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel Betriebs GmbH v Finanzamt Linz; Osterreichische Salinen AG v Same – WLR Daily

Posted February 21st, 2011 in corporation tax, dividends, EC law, law reports, subsidiary companies by sally

Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel Betriebs GmbH v Finanzamt Linz; Osterreichische Salinen AG v Same(Joined Cases C-436/08 and C-437/08); ; [2011] WLR (D) 49

“Legislation of a member state which discriminated against portfolio dividends received by a resident company from a company resident in a non member state party to an EEA Agreement, was contrary to the principle of free movement of capital, where that discrimination was based upon a comprehensive agreement of mutual assistance. It was not contrary to article 63FEU of the FEU Treaty for member states to exempt from corporation tax portfolio dividends which one resident company received from another whilst subjecting portfolio dividends which a resident company received from a non member state company party to an EEA Agreement or from a company resident in another member state, provided that the tax was credited against tax payable in the members state of the recipient company and the administrative burdens were not excessive. National legislation which discriminated against dividends received from non member states on the basis of the shareholding held by the recipient company in the non member state company was not contrary to article 63FEU provided the mechanisms in place to off set the charges to tax led to equivalent results.”

WLR Daily, 18th February 2011

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted February 21st, 2011 in law reports by sally

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011)

Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011)

Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011)

Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011)

Bayat Telephone Systems Internaitonal Inc & Ors v Lord Michael Cecil & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 135 (18 February 2011)

Acre 1127 Ltd (Formerly known as Castle Galleries Ltd) v De Montfort Fine Art Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 130 (18 February 2011)

Kulasekara v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 134 (18 February 2011)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Close Brothers Ltd v Pearce [2011] EWHC 298 (QB) (18 February 2011)

Dainton v Powell [2011] EWHC 219 (QB) (18 February 2011)

Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 296 (QB) (18 February 2011)

Tovey & Ors v Ministry of Justice [2011] EWHC 271 (QB) (18 February 2011)

Lord Ashcroft KCMG v Foley & Ors [2011] EWHC 292 (QB) (18 February 2011)

Hunt v Evening Standard Ltd [2011] EWHC 272 (QB) (18 February 2011)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Roberts v Frohlich & Anor [2011] EWHC 257 (Ch) (18 February 2011)

Hurndell v Hozier & Ors [2011] EWHC 321 (Ch) (18 February 2011)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Jbol Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Health Protection Agency [2011] EWHC 236 (Admin) (18 February 2011)

Bourgass & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 286 (Admin) (18 February 2011)

Waste Recycling Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Cumbria County Council [2011] EWHC 288 (Admin) (18 February 2011)

London Borough of Camden v The Parking Adjudicator & Ors [2011] EWHC 295 (Admin) (18 February 2011)

British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) (14 February 2011)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Crown Aluminium Ltd v Northern & Western Insurance Company Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 277 (TCC) (18 February 2011)

Source: www.bailii.org

Stonham v Ramrattan and another – WLR Daily

“Section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986, which gave a trustee in bankruptcy three years from the date of the bankruptcy to decide what to do about any interest in a house inhabited by the bankrupt or their current or former spouse or civil partner, was concerned only with property which actually formed part of the bankrupt’s estate at the time at the commencement of the bankruptcy. It did not apply to property currently vested in a third party but in respect of which a claim to set aside a transaction at an undervalue might be made under section 339 of the 1986 Act, in respect of which the limitation period remained the 12 years provided for under section 8 of the Limitation Act 1980.”
WLR Daily, 17th February 2011
Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Regina (Hertfordshire County Council) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council – WLR Daily

Posted February 18th, 2011 in community care, detention, law reports, local government, mental health by sally
“A  mental patient who was compulsorily detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 was not thereby to be treated as ‘resident’ in the local authority within whose area he was detained. On a proper construction of section 117(3) of the 1983 Act the patient’s ‘residence’ was distinct from his place of detention. Section 117 of the 1983 Act was the appropriate section, rather than section 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948, to determine which authority should have the responsibility of paying for the patient’s after-care accommodation.”
WLR Daily, 16th February 2011

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.