Quota system may be considered for judges – The Independent

Posted April 29th, 2009 in judiciary, minorities, news by sally

“Quotas for ethnic minority and women judges could be part of new proposals aimed at improving ‘diversity’ in the judiciary. Baroness Julia Neuberger, a government adviser, said she wanted to remove ‘blockages’ faced by applicants for judicial posts and make judges more representative of society.”

Full story

The Independent, 29th April 2009

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Judges look to the lords over strict curb on sentencing powers – The Times

Posted April 16th, 2009 in judiciary, news, sentencing by sally

“The judges are up in arms over changes to the justice system, says Judge Isobel Plumstead, of the Council of Circuit Judges.”

Full story

The Times, 16th April 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Cost of accommodation for High Court judges – Daily Telegraph

Posted April 6th, 2009 in judiciary, news by sally

“Figures released under the Freedom of Information Act have revealed that accommodation for High Court judges is costing taxpayers £5.5 million a year.”

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 4th April 2009

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Judges fail in Tribunal bid to extend working lives beyond 70 – The Times

Posted March 27th, 2009 in judiciary, news, retirement by sally

“Two judges fighting to work beyond the age of 70 have lost their case, the Tribunals Service has said. ”

Full story

The Times, 26th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Objection! Judges reject new robes – The Independent

Posted March 27th, 2009 in court dress, judiciary, news by sally

“The English judiciary has long been regarded as a bastion of conservative mores and sartorial continuity. So when, 10 months ago, former designer of the year Betty Jackson ripped up 300 years of tradition by introducing a new robe for some of England’s most trenchant legal minds, her chutzpah raised eyebrows far beyond the High Court.”

Full story

The Independent, 27th March 2009

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Seventy is far too early for a supreme court judge to retire . . . – The Times

Posted March 26th, 2009 in judiciary, news, retirement, Supreme Court by sally

“The Lord Chancellor will soon be announcing who will fill the vacancies on the new supreme court, which begins work in October when the law lords move across Parliament Square to Middlesex Guildhall. There is a very strong case for increasing the retirement age for supreme court justices from 70 to 75. In 1916 the Earl of Halsbury heard a case on the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords at 92. The Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993 now provides that judges must retire at 70. There is an exception for those first appointed to a judicial office before March 31, 1995. They can continue working until 75.”

Full story

The Times, 26th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Judges group attack sentence plan – BBC News

Posted March 25th, 2009 in judiciary, news, sentencing by sally

“The body which represents 652 judges in England and Wales has attacked government proposals to introduce compulsory guidelines on sentences.”

Full story

BBC News, 25th March 2009

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Names of misbehaving judges ‘should be made public’ – The Guardian

Posted March 16th, 2009 in freedom of information, judiciary, news, professional conduct by sally

“An attempt to force the names of misbehaving judges into the open will be launched tomorrow in a groundbreaking freedom of information case.”

Full story

The Guardian, 16th March 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Lord Judge: recession could harm judicial diversity – The Times

Posted March 12th, 2009 in judiciary, news by sally

“The economic recession could hit efforts to broaden the make-up of the judiciary to bring in candidates from less traditional backgrounds, Britain’s most senior judge said yesterday.”

Full story

The Times, 12th March 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Broadening Britain’s judicial ranks – BBC News

Posted March 11th, 2009 in judiciary, news by sally

“Judges in England and Wales are holding their first conference to try to increase the number of women and people from ethnic minorities in their ranks.”

Full story

BBC News, 11th March 2009

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Comment is Free: Judges possess the weapon to challenge surveillance – The Guardian

Posted February 17th, 2009 in investigatory powers, judiciary, news, privacy by sally

“The British are the most spied upon people in the democratic world, but only the judiciary can restrain parliament.”

Full story

The Guardian, 17th February 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Why solicitors need lessons in complaining – The Times

Posted February 10th, 2009 in delay, judgments, judiciary, news by sally

” The wheels of justice famously grind slow – but these days there are limits even to judicial slowness. More than 2,000 judges in England and Wales have been issued with a deadline for delivering their judgments and if they are late, must explain why.”

Full story

The Times, 10th February 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

O’Brien v Department for Constitutional Affairs – Times Law Reports

Posted February 10th, 2009 in judiciary, law reports, pensions by sally

O’Brien v Department for Constitutional Affairs

Court of Appeal

“A part-time fee-paid judicial office holder was not entitled to claim that he had been subjected to less favourable treatment when he was refused a pension on retirement from office.”

The Times, 10th February 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note that the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Forcing out judges at 70 ‘threatens supreme court’ – The Times

Posted February 3rd, 2009 in judiciary, news, retirement by sally

“Judges are pressing for a change in the law to allow the most senior members of their profession to remain in their posts beyond the age of 70.”

Full story

The Times, 2nd February 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Why being a judge is not so appealing – The Times

Posted January 13th, 2009 in judiciary, special report by sally

“It carries a knighthood, prestige and authority. But it is seen as lonely, fusty and male-dominated, with a culture of ‘male self-confidence and intellectual posturing’.”

Full story

The Times, 13th January 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

A bar on equal opportunity – The Guardian

Posted January 9th, 2009 in barristers, judiciary, news, special report by sally

“No wonder aspiring women and non-white lawyers show no appetite for the practice of literally eating your way to the top.”

Full story

The Guardian, 9th January 2009

Source: www.guardian.co.uk

Fusty image and poor pay put women off being judges – The Times

Posted January 8th, 2009 in judiciary, legal profession, news, women by sally

“The judiciary is losing out on some of the best talent in the legal profession because the work of a High Court judge is perceived as fusty, old-fashioned and underpaid. ”

Full story

The Times, 8th January 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

T-Mobile (UK) Ltd and Another v Office of Communications – Times Law Reports

Posted December 18th, 2008 in competition, judiciary, law reports, telecommunications, tribunals by sally

T-Mobile (UK) Ltd and Another v Office of Communications

Court of Appeal

“An appeal from a decision of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) concerning the award of wireless telegraphy licences lay by way of judicial review and not to the Competition Appeal Tribunal.”

The Times, 18th December 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Dicey Revisited: Separation of powers for the 21st century – speech by Lord Justice Leveson

Posted December 1st, 2008 in constitutional law, judiciary, speeches by sally

“Dicey Revisited: Separation of powers for the 21st century.”

Full speech (PDF)

The Judiciary of England and Wales, 28th November 2008

Source: www.judiciary.gov.uk

Should judges respond to criticism? – The Times

Posted November 27th, 2008 in judiciary, special report by sally

“In 1900, the editor of the Birmingham Daily Argos was fined £100 by the Lord Chief Justice for describing Mr Justice Darling as an ‘impudent little man in horsehair’. The editor avoided a prison sentence for ‘personal scurrilous abuse of a judge’ only because of his abject apology. Today, we rightly take a more tolerant approach to criticism of the judiciary. But the critical comments by Paul Dacre, Editor of the Daily Mail, about the judgments of Mr Justice Eady in privacy cases raise important questions about how judges should respond.”

Full story

The Times, 27th November 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk