Fiduciary Duties of Investment Intermediaries – Law Commission

Posted July 4th, 2014 in fiduciary duty, financial advice, news by tracey

‘Report responding to concerns raised in the 2012 Kay Review that uncertainty about their legal duties leads investors to focus on short-term movements in share price rather than making long-term investment decisions based on the fundamental value of a company.’

Full report

Law Commission, 1st July 2014

Source: www.justice.gov.uk/lawcommission

Get informed – New Law Journal

Posted June 11th, 2014 in divorce, financial advice, mortgages, news by sally

‘Natasha Phillips underlines the importance of mortgage capacity assessments in divorce proceedings.’

Full story

New Law Journal, 6th June 2014

Source: www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Clark and another v In Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd (Financial Ombudsman Service intervening) – WLR Daily

Clark and another v In Focus Asset Management & Tax Solutions Ltd (Financial Ombudsman Service intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 118; [2014] WLR (D) 76

‘The doctrine of res judicata precluded a complainant who had accepted an award made by the Financial Ombudsman Service from starting legal proceedings to pursue complaints which had already been submitted to the ombudsman service and which the ombudsman had decided. Further, section 228(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 did not exclude the operation of res judicata.’

WLR Daily, 14th February 2014

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Customers lose right to sue after taking ombudsman compensation – Daily Telefgraph

Posted February 17th, 2014 in compensation, financial advice, news, ombudsmen by sally

‘Financial services customers who have accepted compensation from the ombudsman can no longer sue for further redress in court following a landmark Court of Appeal ruling.’

Full story

Daily Telegraph, 14th February 2014

Source: www.telegraph.co.uk

Litigation privilege did not apply to correspondence before litigation was “reasonably anticipated”, judge says – OUT-LAW.com

Posted January 24th, 2014 in burden of proof, financial advice, news, privilege by sally

‘A brewing company was unable to prevent correspondence between itself and its bank and accountants from being disclosed during a dispute connected with the sale of its eastern European business, a High Court judge has ruled.

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 23rd January 2014

Source: www.out-law.com

Strengthening the legal duties on financial professionals to act in the best interests of savers – Law Commission

Posted October 29th, 2013 in consultations, fiduciary duty, financial advice, Law Commission, news, pensions, trusts by sally

“Today [22 October] the Law Commission publishes a consultation paper reviewing how ‘fiduciary duties’ apply to investment intermediaries. The paper traces a chain of intermediaries from an individual, saving for a pension, to the registered shareholder of a UK company. It looks at the obligations of those in the chain to act in the interests of savers.”

Full story

Law Commission, 22nd October 2013

Source: www.lawcommission.justice.gov.uk

Debt adviser jailed for preying on ‘vulnerable’ customers – BBC News

“A self styled debt adviser has been jailed for bullying customers into remortgaging their homes and then pocketing the money for himself.”

Full story

BBC News, 21st August 2013

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Banks win mis-selling case at appeal court – Law Society’s Gazette

Posted August 5th, 2013 in appeals, banking, consumer protection, financial advice, interest, news by sally

“The Court of Appeal has dealt a blow to businesses bringing claims against banks for allegedly mis-selling interest rate swaps products by dismissing a claim against the Royal Bank of Scotland.”

Full story

Law Society’s Gazette, 5th August 2013

Source: www.lawgazette.co.uk

Clack: SAAMCO in practice – Hardwicke Chambers

Posted June 26th, 2013 in financial advice, negligence, news, professional conduct, solicitors by sally

“In Nigel Clack v Wrigleys Solicitors LLP [2013] EWHC 413 (Ch), Mr Nicholas Strauss QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) found for the Claimant client against his former Solicitors.”

Full story

Hardwicke Chambers, 24th June 2013

Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk

Emptage v Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd – WLR Daily

Emptage v Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd: [2013] EWCA Civ 729; [2013] WLR (D) 242

“Where a broker had negligently advised a client to take out an interest-only mortgage and make an investment in foreign property in the expectation that the investment would pay off the entirety of the mortgage, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd was required to take into account both elements of the advice when assessing the client’s compensation for the broker’s breach of duty as a mortgage adviser under the scheme’s rules.”

WLR Daily, 18th June 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Legal Ombudsman chairman calls for major expansion in jurisdiction – Legal Futures

“All consumers of legal services – using a broad definition that includes ‘linked professional services and advice that has a legal dimension’ – should have access to the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), its chairman said today.”

Full story

Legal Futures, 13th June 2013

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Genil 48 SL and another v Bankinter SA and another – WLR Daily

Posted June 6th, 2013 in banking, EC law, financial advice, law reports by sally

Genil 48 SL and another v Bankinter SA and another (Case C-604/11); [2013] WLR (D) 213

“An investment service was offered as part of a financial product within the meaning of article 19(9) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/39/EC of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments only when it formed an integral part thereof at the time when that financial product was offered to the client.”

WLR Daily, 30th May 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Pitt and another v Holt and another; Futter and another v Futter and others – WLR Daily

Posted May 14th, 2013 in financial advice, law reports, mistake, Supreme Court, taxation, trusts by sally

Pitt and another v Holt and another; Futter and another v Futter and others [2013] UKSC 26; [2013] WLR (D) 172

“The court’s jurisdiction to intervene in a decision made by trustees who were acting within their power arose only if they could be shown to have acted in breach of duty. Trustees who wished to exercise a discretion which was within their powers and sought and acted on the advice of apparently competent professional advisers not in breach of duty merely because the professional advice turned out to be incorrect.”

WLR Daily, May 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Supreme Court ruling on trustee mistakes “likely to create uncertainty”, says expert – OUT-LAW.com

“A Supreme Court ruling on the circumstances in which courts can set aside decisions made wrongly by trustees is ‘likely to create uncertainty’ due to the subjective nature of the test, an expert has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 10th May 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Advice restricted to ‘passive investments’ cannot be called independent, says FSA – OUT-LAW.com

Posted February 14th, 2013 in financial advice, financial regulation, news, regulations by sally

“Financial advisers cannot be said to be ‘independent’ if they offer retail investment advice to clients based solely on their assessment of ‘passive investments’, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has said.”

Full story

OUT-LAW.com, 13th February 2013

Source: www.out-law.com

Banks to pay for ‘swap’ mis-selling, FSA demands – BBC News

Posted February 1st, 2013 in banking, compensation, financial advice, financial regulation, news by tracey

“Four banks will now compensate tens of thousands of small businesses who were mis-sold complex insurance deals, says the Financial Services Authority.”

Full story

BBC News, 31st January 2013

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Regina (Prudential plc and another) v Special Comr of Income Tax and another (Institute of Chartered Accountants and others intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted January 25th, 2013 in accountants, financial advice, law reports, legal profession, privilege, taxation by tracey

Regina (Prudential plc and another) v Special Comr of Income Tax and another (Institute of Chartered Accountants and others intervening): [2013] UKSC 1;   [2013] WLR (D)  20

“Legal advice privilege would not be extended to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than members of the legal profession, even where that advice was legal advice which the professional person was qualified to give.”

WLR Daily, 23rd January 2013

Source: www.iclr.co.uk

Legal advice privilege should not extend to accountant’s advice, says Supreme Court – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted January 24th, 2013 in accountants, financial advice, news, privilege, Supreme Court by sally

“The Supreme Court has ruled that legal advice privilege should only apply to advice given by a member of the legal profession; that this is what the common law has always meant, and that any wider interpretation would lead to uncertainty. Two strong dissents do not find any principled underpinning for the restriction of the privilege to advice from solicitors or barristers.”

Full story

UK Human Rights Blog, 24th January 2013

Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com

Bar Council welcomes Supreme Court ruling on LLP – The Bar Council

Posted January 24th, 2013 in accountants, barristers, financial advice, news, privilege, Supreme Court by sally

“The Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has welcomed the 5:2 majority ruling of the Supreme Court against extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers, following a case put forward by financial services group, Prudential, requesting that LPP be extended to protect advice given by accountants.”

Full story

The Bar Council, 23rd January 2013

Source: www.barcouncil.org.uk

R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) – Supreme Court

Posted January 23rd, 2013 in accountants, financial advice, law reports, legal profession, privilege, taxation by sally

R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 1 | UKSC 2010/0215 (YouTube)

Supreme Court, 23rd January 2013

Source: www.youtube.com/user/UKSupremeCourt