GH v GH – FDRs Are Not to Be Dispensed With – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted October 28th, 2024 in divorce, families, family courts, financial dispute resolution, news by sally

‘If ever there were any doubts as to the importance of the FDR appointment and the parties’ attendance at one, then Mr Justice Peel has unequivocally put those doubts to rest in his judgment in GH v GH [2024] EWFC 272, published on 3 October 2024. The court’s ongoing focus on assisting parties to resolve financial remedy proceedings in a timely and proportionate manner means that FDRs (including private FDRs) are, perhaps unsurprisingly, still receiving significant praise and judicial support.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 21st October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

No Special Favours: Litigants in Person and the Financial Remedies Court – Financial Remedies Journal

‘No Special Favours: Litigants in Person and the Financial Remedies Court’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 23rd October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

AI and Family Law – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted October 21st, 2024 in artificial intelligence, families, family courts, legal profession, news by sally

‘AI has the real likelihood of transforming the practice of family law solicitors more than the major conceptual changes from the Children Act, the seismic shift from White or the speed of response needed from lis pendens of EU law – a transformation which will happen fast even in the slow-moving, conservative legal profession.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 14th October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

A 40-Year Revolution in Financial Remedies – Financial Remedies Journal

‘My subject today is revolution. Don’t worry. I am not advocating a take-over of the country by Tommy Robinson or Piers Corbyn. I am talking about the fundamental transformation of financial remedy work since I undertook my first ever case on 19 July 1983 in the Edmonton County Court, just over 41 years ago.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 16th October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Delaying a Divorce Because of Financial Prejudice: The New No-fault Law and Practice – Financial Remedies Journal

‘There can be real loss and prejudice in some divorce cases if the final divorce order, previously the decree absolute, is granted before the final financial settlement and its implementation in circumstances when the paying party then dies. Automatic entitlement to pensions, the primary circumstance, but also insurance policies, beneficial interest in trusts and similar are then not available as the applicant is now divorced, financial remedy claims are no longer available after death and there might have to be a difficult and separate civil claim.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 7th October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Resolution’s Report on Domestic Abuse in Financial Remedy Proceedings: An Overview of the Key Findings and Recommendations – Financial Remedies Journal

‘Resolution’s Report on Domestic Abuse in Financial Remedy Proceedings: An Overview of the Key Findings and Recommendations.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 8th October 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Cafcass adopts new policy to protect victims of domestic abuse in court system – Local Government Lawyer

‘Family Court Advisors and Children’s Guardians will no longer use language such as ‘claims’ or ‘alleges’ in reports to court, using instead the words of children and adults who are victims of domestic abuse, in line with a new Domestic Abuse Practice Policy published by Cafcass.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 11th October 2024

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Family court judges use victim-blaming language in domestic abuse cases, finds AI project – The Guardian

‘Judges in the family courts are using victim-blaming and gender-biased language towards domestic abuse survivors, AI analysis of judgments and appeals in England and Wales reveals.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 8th October 2024

Source: www.theguardian.com

Andrii Koshman: Judicial Accountability in the Digital Justice System of Tomorrow – UK Constitutional Law Association

‘In 2018, Sir Ernest Ryder warned that the future shift to online dispute resolution for most, and in some areas all disputes, risks eroding judicial accountability and fostering a democratic deficit. The pandemic, the £1.3 billion court modernisation program and six years later, the future of resolving the majority of disputes online appears to be much closer. The implementation of a truly holistic Digital Justice System – an integrated system of online advice services, online public and private out-of-court dispute resolution services (mediation and arbitration portals, ombuds services) and online courts – can make this future a reality. In fact, it is expressly intended that the majority of civil, family, and tribunal disputes will be settled or resolved online through the Digital Justice System, in accordance with rules specifically developed by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC) to cover the online pre-action and action space. It is also notable that such a system of various online private and public portals will have a common data architecture based on the open digital standards developed by OPRC. It is not yet known when this system will become operational, but as we approach such a reality, the potential loss of accountability and democratic deficit needs to be addressed as an extremely urgent threat.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 3rd October 2024

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Care proceedings quicker with more disposals within 26 weeks: MoJ – Local Government Lawyer

‘The average time for public law care or supervision cases to reach first disposal was 41 weeks in April to June 2024, down 3 weeks from the same quarter in 2023, according to the latest data published by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 27th September 2024

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Fewer complaints about barristers’ use of social media – Legal Futures

The number of reports to the Bar Standards Board (BSB) about barristers’ use of social media has unexpectedly fallen but an increasing proportion relate to “controversial social and political issues”.

Full Story

Legal Futures, 30th September 2024

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Keep out! When justice cannot be seen to be done, how do we know it’s been done? – Transparency Project

‘Magistrates’ courts conducting family justice are now part of the Family Court, established in 2014, and subject to the same rules as those presided over by district, circuit and High Court judges. Under those rules, accredited media reporters and ‘legal bloggers’ (see below) are entitled to attend hearings even if they take place in private, though they can’t report anything without the court’s permission.’

Full Story

Transparency Project, 24th September 2024

Source: transparencyproject.org.uk

Are You Guilty of Money-Laundering? A Tale of Chinese Cotton, Lawyer’s Fees and Unintended Consequences – Financial Remedies Journal

‘It is not often that a family law blog warns ordinary hard-working honest family lawyers that they might be unwitting criminals. This is that blog. You should read it.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 17th September 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Enhancing Public Understanding of Financial Remedies on Divorce – Financial Remedies Journal

‘Why is it that lawyers think that the principles underpinning financial remedies are clear, and yet the public are often perplexed? The issue is one of communication, or rather translating the law into plain English.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 20th September 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Sophia Stapleton explores and explains orders made under Section 91(14): Protection from further applications under the Children Act 1989 – 2DRJ

Posted September 4th, 2024 in chambers articles, children, domestic violence, families, family courts, news by sally

‘A section 91(14) order is also sometimes known as a ‘barring order’, but this is misleading. Orders made under section 91(14) of the Children Act 1989 stop a named person from making any application under the Children Act 1989 without the court’s permission.’

Full Story

2DRJ, 3rd September 2024

Source: www.2drj.com

Absence of Authority? – Financial Remedies Journal

‘In G v S (Family Law Act 1996: Publicity) [2024] EWFC 231 (B) (6 June 2024) HHJ Reardon asked:

“What is the default position in terms of publication in a case where s 12 [of the Administration of Justice Act 1969] does not apply?”’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 1st September 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Family Law Newsletter – August 2024 – Spire Barristers

Posted September 2nd, 2024 in chambers articles, families, family courts, news by sally

‘Family Law Newsletter – August 2024; Articles, news, legislation updates and case updates from Care Proceedings, Private Law and Financial Remedy matters.’

Full Story

Spire Barristers, 19th August 2024

Source: www.spirebarristers.co.uk

‘It’s not like you were beaten’: The horrifying misogyny vulnerable women face from the judge’s bench – The Independent

‘Domestic abuse survivors warn that – inside the secretive family courts – they are being ‘retraumatised’ by the legal system, and say judges are the worst offenders.’

Full Story

The Independent, 17th August 2024

Source: www.independent.co.uk

HJB v WPB: Beware the Preliminary Issue – Financial Remedies Journal

‘In BN v MA [2013] EWHC 4250 (Fam) Mostyn J observed:

“[24] … In Granatino v Radmacher the Supreme Court analysed very closely the nature of nuptial agreements. They pointed out that nuptial agreements come in numerous shapes and forms and can be entered into at any point before, during or after a marriage …
[26] The Supreme Court has modified the test for the treatment of these nuptial agreements, as expressed in Edgar and Xydhias and, indeed, in MacLeod, so as to provide one single test applicable to all nuptial agreements, which is this, “The court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement”. That now is the test to be applied in every case where a nuptial agreement falls for consideration.” ‘

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 16th August 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

NCDR Redux: The Impact of October’s CPR Amendments – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted August 19th, 2024 in civil procedure rules, costs, dispute resolution, families, family courts, news by sally

‘One of the changes to the FPR 2010 made when the material parts of the Family Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2023 came into force on 29 April 2024 was an amendment to r 28.3(7) which by the insertion of a new (aa)(ii) makes “any failure by a party, without good reason, to attend non-court dispute resolution” a basis to depart from the general starting point that there should be no order as to costs. This is repeated in para 10E of PD 3A which states “the court may take the parties conduct in relation to attending non-court dispute resolution into account when considering whether to make an order for costs in relation to the proceedings”.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 16th August 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com