McHale and another v Cadogan and another (Cadogan Square Ltd intervening) – WLR Daily

Posted January 4th, 2011 in enfranchisement, landlord & tenant, law reports, leases by sally

McHale and another v Cadogan and another (Cadogan Square Ltd intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 1471; [2010] WLR (D) 345

“Qualifying tenants on exercise of their right to collective enfranchisement wishing to purchase the freehold interest would have their interests valued on the basis that the rights to enfranchisement did not exist.”

WLR Daily, 22nd December 2010

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Portman Estate Nominees (One) Ltd and Another v Ackerman and Another – Times Law Reports

Posted January 15th, 2009 in enfranchisement, law reports, leases by sally

Portman Estate Nominees (One) Ltd and Another v Ackerman and Another

Court of Appeal

“Service of a notice by a tenant seeking to acquire a new lease of a flat had the effect of preserving the position pending determination of the claim and did not provide for continuation of only a part of the lease.”

The Times, 15th January 2009

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Portman Estate Nominees (One) Ltd and another v Ackerman and another – WLR Daily

Posted December 19th, 2008 in enfranchisement, law reports, leases by sally

Portman Estate Nominees (One) Ltd and another v Ackerman and another [2008] EWCA Civ 1428; [2008] WLR (D) 399

The service of a notice by a tenant seeking to acquire a new lease of a flat only had the effect of preserving the position pending determination of the claim and did not provide for continuation of the lease of premises in which the flat was contained.”

WLR Daily, 18th December 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.


Earl Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another and Other Appeals – Times Law Reports

Posted December 17th, 2008 in enfranchisement, law reports, leases, valuation by sally

Earl Cadogan and Another v Sportelli and Another and Other Appeals

House of Lords

“Landlords and freeholders were generally not entitled to so-called ‘hope value’ as an element in the value of their interest in determining the price payable by the tenants for leasehold enfranchisement.”

The Times, 17th December 2008 

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.

Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another – WLR Daily

Posted December 11th, 2008 in enfranchisement, law reports, leases, valuation by sally

Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71; [2008] WLR (D) 378

“In determining the price payable by tenants for leasehold enfranchisement, landlords and freeholders generally were not entitled to ‘hope value’ as an element in the value of their interests.”

WLR Daily, 10th December 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and others; Earl Cadogan and another v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd – WLR Daily

Posted June 27th, 2008 in enfranchisement, landlord & tenant, law reports, leases by sally

Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and others; Earl Cadogan and another v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd [2008] UKHL 44; [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 208

“A head lessee of a block of flats could be a qualifying tenant of an individual flat in the block so as to be entitled to claim a lease extension for it under s 39 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.”

WLR Daily, 26th June 2008

Source: www.lawreports.co.uk

Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed.

Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and Others; Earl Cadogan and Another v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd Before Lord – Times Law Reports

Posted June 27th, 2008 in enfranchisement, landlord & tenant, law reports, leases by sally

Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and Others; Earl Cadogan and Another v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd

House of Lords

“A head lessee of a block of flats could be a qualifying tenant of an individual flat in the block so as to be entitled to claim a lease extension for it under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993.”

The Times, 27th June 2008

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Please note the Times Law Reports are only available free on Times Online for 21 days from the date of publication.