Liability for omissions: Is the law as it should be? – 12 King’s Bench Walk

Posted November 14th, 2024 in duty of care, negligence, news, police, road safety, Supreme Court, vicarious liability by tracey

‘John-Paul Swoboda examines liability for omissions in the police negligence case of Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2024] UKSC 33.’

Full story

12 King’s Bench Walk, 6th November 2024

Source: www.12kbw.co.uk

Liability of Police Authorities and the Decision in Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police – Ropewalk Personal Injury Blog

Posted November 12th, 2024 in duty of care, negligence, news, police, road safety, Supreme Court, vicarious liability by tracey

‘On 23 October 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2024] UKSC 33. The decision is the latest in many higher court decisions regarding the liability of police authorities to the public where they suffer injury.’

Full Story

Ropewalk Personal Injury Blog, 11th November 2024

Source: ropewalk.co.uk

Police not liable for failing to protect someone from injury: Supreme Court – UK Human Rights Blog

Posted November 12th, 2024 in duty of care, negligence, news, police, road safety, Supreme Court, vicarious liability by tracey

‘Tindall and another (Appellants) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Respondent) [2024] UKSC 33, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 25. The Supreme Court has affirmed that there is no duty of care, and hence no liability in negligence, for failing to confer a benefit, which includes failing to protect a person from injury, as opposed to making matters worse. This applies equally to public authorities such as the police as it does to private individuals.’

Full Story

UK Human Rights Blog, 11th November 2024

Source: ukhumanrightsblog.com

AK on Shipping, Monthly, Issue 8 – 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square

Posted November 5th, 2024 in chambers articles, contracts, duty of care, news, shipping law, ships, theft by tracey

‘This month’s issue reviews the summaries of two cases decided in May 2024: (i) MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2024] UKSC 18 and (ii) Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc v RAV Bahamas Ltd [2024] UKPC 11.’

Full Story

4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, 4th November 2024

Source: www.4-5.co.uk

Integrated care board breached duty to provide lawful health care plan: High Court – Local Government Lawyer

‘North Central London Integrated Care Board was in breach of its duty to ensure a severely disabled boy has a lawful health care plan, the High Court has found.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 31st October 2024

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Preventing sexual harassment in the workplace – how to prepare for the party season – Kingsley Napley Employment Law Blog

‘It seems somewhat apt, then, that the mandatory duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace has come into force (the Preventative Duty)—just in time for this year’s Christmas parties. Employers have long been subject to a legal duty to provide a safe and supportive working environment for all staff but this new duty takes things further.’

Full Story

Kingsley Napley Employment Law Blog, 30th October 2024

Source: www.kingsleynapley.co.uk

The cost of success for women’s football; are women footballers paying the price for popularity? – 12 King’s Bench Walk

Posted September 25th, 2024 in chambers articles, duty of care, employment, negligence, news, sport, women by tracey

‘In recent years, women’s football has experienced an unprecedented surge in popularity and commercialisation. This growth has been beneficial in many respects, but brings to the forefront significant concerns regarding player welfare, particularly the prevalence of injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. These issues have potentially significant legal and regulatory implications.’

Full Story

12 King's Bench Walk, 19th September 2024

Source: 12kbw.co.uk

Venues and clubs to face fines up to £18 million as part of new anti-terrorism measures – The Independent

Posted September 13th, 2024 in bills, duty of care, fines, news, terrorism by tracey

‘Venues and nightclubs could face fines of up to £18 million if they flout new rules to protect visitors and staff from terror attacks.’

Full Story

The Independent, 12th September 2024

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Coroner says ‘no causal link’ between The Jeremy Kyle Show and death of guest – The Independent

Posted September 11th, 2024 in coroners, duty of care, families, inquests, media, mental health, news, suicide by tracey

‘A coroner has ruled that The Jeremy Kyle Show’s treatment of Steve Dymond was not a “contributory factor” to his death.’

Full Story

The Independent, 10th September 2024

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Who knew? Or ought to have known? – Nearly Legal

Posted August 27th, 2024 in defective premises, duty of care, landlord & tenant, news, repairs by tracey

‘Mann v Martin (2024) EW Misc 23 (CC). Standalone section 4 Defective Premises Act 1972 cases are quite unusual. It is more common as an additional/secondary head in a disrepair claim, but this county court case is such a relatively rare beast.’

Full Story

Nearly Legal, 26th August 2024

Source: nearlylegal.co.uk

EHRC consultation: Updated guidance on sexual harassment – Kingsley Napley Employment Law Blog

‘The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has today launched a consultation on its long awaited updated technical guidance on sexual harassment and harassment at work.’

Full Story

Kingsley Napley Employment Law Blog, 9th July 2024

Source: www.kingsleynapley.co.uk

MoD to compensate thousands of veterans over hearing loss – BBC News

‘Thousands more ex-servicemen and women will receive compensation for hearing loss suffered during training or combat, the BBC has learned.’

Full Story

BBC News, 8th July 2024

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Did you miss? Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council [2024] UKSC 15 – Gatehouse Chambers

‘The claim arose from the encroachment of Japanese knotweed from the appellant local authority’s (“LA”) land into the respondent’s garden. The respondent had purchased his property in 2004, after the encroachment of Japanese knotweed had begun. It was held that the LA could not be blamed for the encroachment at this time. An actionable tort of private nuisance however arose in 2013, when the local authority should have become aware of the risk of damage and loss of amenity to the respondent’s land as a result of information about Japanese knotweed which became publicly available at that time. The LA was held liable in private nuisance for having failed to prevent the encroachment between 2013 to 2018 when the LA implemented a reasonable and effective treatment programme.’

Full Story

Gatehouse Chambers, 28th May 2024

Source: gatehouselaw.co.uk

JCT DB 2024 – a bit of ‘give and take’ on contractor design liability – OUT-LAW.com

Posted May 14th, 2024 in building law, construction industry, contracts, duty of care, news by tracey

‘The standard of care to be expected of a contractor in terms of design liability has been toughened up in the updated Design and Build contract by the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT), but the latest version has also made clear that contractors will not have fitness for purpose obligations imposed on them.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 14th May 2024

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

High Court throws out £110m claim against law firms – Legal Futures

Posted April 11th, 2024 in abuse of process, duty of care, law firms, news, striking out by sally

‘A businessman who brought a claim against two leading law firms, and also reported them and those representing them to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), has seen his case struck out.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 11th April 2024

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Miller v Irwin Mitchell LLP – Hailsham Chambers

Posted March 20th, 2024 in appeals, chambers articles, duty of care, law firms, news, solicitors by sally

‘The Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Miller v Irwin Mitchell on 1 February 2024, just 9 days after hearing argument. The Court (Phillips, Andrews and Falk LJJ) upheld the decision of HHJ Cadwallader at first instance ([2022] EWHC 2252 (Ch)), in which he dismissed Mrs Miller’s claim after a trial of various preliminary issues. The decision gives useful guidance to practitoners considering whether a duty of care is owed by a solicitor prior to the parties agreeing a retainer.’

Full Story

Hailsham Chambers, 5th February 2024

Source: www.hailshamchambers.com

Asylum seeker with home-made boat sentenced after four migrants die in Channel – The Independent

‘An asylum seeker has been detained for nine years and six months for the manslaughter of fellow migrants who drowned trying to cross the English Channel.’

Full Story

The Independent, 23rd February 2024

Source: www.independent.co.uk

Royal Marines to fight MoD in court in asbestos claim – BBC News

‘A group of 260 Royal Marines have issued proceedings against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) amid claims they were “knowingly” exposed to asbestos.’

Full Story

BBC News, 12th February 2024

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Housing and Children Act – homeless 17 year olds – Nearly Legal

Posted January 15th, 2024 in children, duty of care, families, homelessness, housing, local government, news by tracey

‘A couple of brief notes on two judicial reviews on housing, the Children Act 1989 and “looked-after children”.’

Full Story

Nearly Legal, 14th January 2024

Source: nearlylegal.co.uk

We all die: what are doctors’ duties to shield families from the sight of death? – Mental Capacity Law and Policy

‘In Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2024] UKSC 1, the Supreme Court had to decide whether (and, if so, when) an individual can make a claim for psychiatric injury caused by witnessing the death or other horrifying event of a close relative as a result of earlier clinical negligence. In dismissing the three conjoined appeals, a majority of the Supreme Court held that, while doctors owe a duty of care to protect the health of their patients, they do not owe a duty of care to members of the patient’s close family to protect them against the risk of illness from the experience of witnessing the death or medical crisis of their relative from a condition which the doctor has negligently failed to diagnose or treat.’

Full Story

Mental Capacity Law and Policy, 11th January 2024

Source: www.mentalcapacitylawandpolicy.org.uk