Housing disrepair and ADR following Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (Law Society and others intervening) [2023] EWCA Civ 1416 – Park Square Barristers

Posted December 19th, 2024 in appeals, chambers articles, dispute resolution, housing, local government, news, repairs by sally

‘It has been over 12 months since the decision in Churchill was handed down by the Court of Appeal. My anecdotal experience is that the disrepair landscape did not change drastically for around nine months; however, in the last three months I have seen Churchill arise in both Defences and applications made early in proceedings. I anticipate that reliance on the authority will continue to grow.’

Full Story

Park Square Barristers, 17th December 2024

Source: www.parksquarebarristers.co.uk

Little sign of slowdown in solicitor-client costs disputes – Legal Futures

Posted December 17th, 2024 in appeals, costs, dispute resolution, news, solicitors, statistics by tracey

‘Few costs lawyers have seen a reduction in disputes between solicitors and their clients despite 2022’s Court of Appeal ruling in Belsner, their representative body has reported.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 17th December 2024

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Avoiding the Bear Traps of Arbitration – Some Tips from the Coalface – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted December 10th, 2024 in arbitration, dispute resolution, news by tracey

‘Arbitration is the form of ADR on everyone’s lips – even more so now with the new NCDR provisions that have come into force. Slow to get going, after its launch in 2012, and after Haley v Haley ironed out people’s concerns about routes to appeal, arbitration is sometimes hailed as being the silver bullet solution – a client-pleasing way to avoid the challenges that come with the court service. Providing a confidential and streamlined process for those wanting to avoid the delays and potential publicity of a court process, its attraction for clients, other than the additional fees of the arbitrator, are obvious.

However, there are traps that one can fall into, and stumbling blocks we have identified which prevent people from arbitrating, cause difficulties in the process and can add to the cost for clients, which can tarnish the lustre of our proverbial silver bullet.

Here are our lessons learned over the past few years.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 2nd December 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Court of Appeal allows appeal concerning amenability to judicial review of decision by adjudicator – 39 Essex Chambers

’39 Essex Chambers barristers Vikram Sachdeva KC and Jake Thorold have successfully represented the appellant in a Court of Appeal case concerning the amenability to judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed by the Secretary of State determining a dispute arising out of a contract governing the provision of primary care services.’

Full Story

39 Essex Chambers, 3rd December 2024

Source: www.39essex.com

Civil Justice Council report calls for pre-action protocol on judicial review to require parties to make positions on ADR clear – Local Government Lawyer

‘The pre-action protocol (PAP) for judicial review should be amended to make sure the parties make clear their position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) at an early stage, a report produced for the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has recommended.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 27th November 2024

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Privilege series part 1: Privilege in shareholder disputes – is change afoot? – Kingsley Napley Immigration Blog

Posted November 15th, 2024 in chambers articles, dispute resolution, news, privilege, shareholders by sally

‘For over a century, it has been a well-established rule that a company cannot claim legal privilege against its own shareholders (Woodhouse & Co. Ltd v Woodhouse). This grants shareholders the right to access legal advice obtained by the company concerning its affairs. However, there is a recognised exception to this rule: if the legal advice pertains to actual or anticipated litigation between the company and the shareholder, the company can claim privilege.’

Full Story

Kingsley Napley Immigration Blog, 14th November 2024

Source: www.kingsleynapley.co.uk

Form FM5 and MIAM’s – Becket Chambers

‘It has been a requirement for a number of years that before financial proceedings or children matters that the applicant, save for a few exemptions, is required to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting [MIAM]. Often by the time parties attend their MIAM, they have reached the stage of utter frustration and have felt that the only way forward was to go to court. The MIAM for some people became a mere hurdle to be overcome so that they could go to court, it was a tick box exercise.’

Full Story

Becket Chambers, 24th September 2024

Source: becket-chambers.co.uk

Court orders parties to engage in ADR over costs – Legal Futures

Posted October 16th, 2024 in civil procedure rules, costs, defamation, dispute resolution, media, news by sally

‘A ruling that a former Conservative MP and a national newspaper must engage in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) before their argument over costs can be heard is a landmark that could herald the start of a new era, the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has said.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 16th October 2024

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

Mediation in England and Wales – OUT-LAW.com

Posted October 8th, 2024 in Commercial Court, county courts, dispute resolution, fees, news by sally

‘Mediation is a voluntary and confidential process using the services of a mediator, who is a neutral third party who will attempt to facilitate negotiation by the parties of an agreed settlement.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 7th October 2024

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Andrii Koshman: Judicial Accountability in the Digital Justice System of Tomorrow – UK Constitutional Law Association

‘In 2018, Sir Ernest Ryder warned that the future shift to online dispute resolution for most, and in some areas all disputes, risks eroding judicial accountability and fostering a democratic deficit. The pandemic, the £1.3 billion court modernisation program and six years later, the future of resolving the majority of disputes online appears to be much closer. The implementation of a truly holistic Digital Justice System – an integrated system of online advice services, online public and private out-of-court dispute resolution services (mediation and arbitration portals, ombuds services) and online courts – can make this future a reality. In fact, it is expressly intended that the majority of civil, family, and tribunal disputes will be settled or resolved online through the Digital Justice System, in accordance with rules specifically developed by the Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC) to cover the online pre-action and action space. It is also notable that such a system of various online private and public portals will have a common data architecture based on the open digital standards developed by OPRC. It is not yet known when this system will become operational, but as we approach such a reality, the potential loss of accountability and democratic deficit needs to be addressed as an extremely urgent threat.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 3rd October 2024

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

Andrii Koshman: Judicial Accountability in the Digital Justice System of Tomorrow – UK Constitutional Law Association

‘In 2018, Sir Ernest Ryder warned that the future shift to online dispute resolution for most, and in some areas all disputes, risks eroding judicial accountability and fostering a democratic deficit. The pandemic, the £1.3 billion court modernisation program and six years later, the future of resolving the majority of disputes online appears to be much closer. The implementation of a truly holistic Digital Justice System – an integrated system of online advice services, online public and private out-of-court dispute resolution services (mediation and arbitration portals, ombuds services) and online courts – can make this future a reality.’

Full Story

UK Constitutional Law Association, 3rd October 2024

Source: ukconstitutionallaw.org

New English court rules will encourage settlement of litigation – OUT-LAW.com

Posted October 2nd, 2024 in appeals, civil procedure rules, dispute resolution, news by tracey

‘New court rules in place from 1 October could lead to judges in England and Wales more frequently ordering parties to disputes to try to resolve them out of court.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 1st October 2024

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Judge says taxpayers’ cash ‘wasted’ on housing row – BBC News

Posted October 2nd, 2024 in dispute resolution, housing, local government, news by tracey

‘A stand-off between a council and a developer over a £12,000 bill could ultimately cost city taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds.’

Full Story

BBC News, 2nd October 2024

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Forging documents in litigation constituted an unlawful means conspiracy (Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd and others) – Gatehouse Chambers

‘Dispute Resolution analysis: Having set aside an earlier judgment on the basis that the claim had been defeated by a forged document, the Claimant was able to use that same forgery to found a successful new claim for unlawful means conspiracy.’

Full Story

Gatehouse Chambers, 21st August 2024

Source: gatehouselaw.co.uk

English institutions and law popular for global dispute resolution – OUT-LAW.com

Posted September 16th, 2024 in arbitration, bills, Commercial Court, dispute resolution, news by tracey

‘New research shows the important role that English law, courts and arbitration bodies play in dispute resolution in a competitive global market, experts have said.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 13th September 2024

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

NCDR Redux: The Impact of October’s CPR Amendments – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted August 19th, 2024 in civil procedure rules, costs, dispute resolution, families, family courts, news by tracey

‘One of the changes to the FPR 2010 made when the material parts of the Family Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2023 came into force on 29 April 2024 was an amendment to r 28.3(7) which by the insertion of a new (aa)(ii) makes “any failure by a party, without good reason, to attend non-court dispute resolution” a basis to depart from the general starting point that there should be no order as to costs. This is repeated in para 10E of PD 3A which states “the court may take the parties conduct in relation to attending non-court dispute resolution into account when considering whether to make an order for costs in relation to the proceedings”.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 16th August 2024

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Case Analysis: Lakatamia fails in latest unlawful means conspiracy claim (Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Su and others) – Gatehouse Chambers

‘Dispute Resolution analysis: A long-standing judgment creditor has failed in largely undefended claims for unlawful means conspiracy and the Marex tort in a judgment which shines significant light on the approach of the Court to claims which are not actively defended.’

Full Story

Gatehouse Chambers, 26th July 2024

Source: gatehouselaw.co.uk

A Paradigm Case for Non-court Dispute Resolution – Becket Chambers

‘The court’s duty to further the overriding objective by actively case managing has been given added impetus by the revisions to FPR Part 3 and Part 28 which came into effect on the 29 April 2024.’

Full Story

Becket Chambers, 23rd July 2024

Source: becket-chambers.co.uk

Adjudication and Collateral Warranties – Supreme Court Decision in Abbey v Simply – 4 New Square

‘In this article, 4 New Square Chambers’ Douglas James considers the Supreme Court’s decision in Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd (Respondent) v Augusta 2008 LLP (formerly Simply Construct (UK) LLP) (Appellant) [2024] UKSC 23 and its implications for adjudication business.’

Full Story

4 New Square, 15th July 2024

Source: www.4newsquare.com

UK ratification of cross-border enforcement treaty gives businesses greater certainty – OUT-LAW.com

Posted July 8th, 2024 in dispute resolution, enforcement, foreign jurisdictions, judgments, news by tracey

‘Businesses should be able to enforce English court rulings more easily in other countries in future after the UK ratified an international treaty on the cross-border enforcement of judgments.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 4th July 2024

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com