ZXC v Bloomberg: privacy expectations about criminal investigations – Panopticon

‘The Court of Appeal has today given judgment in the long-running ZXC v Bloomberg litigation ([2020] EWCA Civ 611). The key points:

1. In general, a person does have a reasonable expectation of privacy about the fact that/details of their being subject to a police investigation, up to the point of charge.
2. Reporting about alleged conduct is different from reporting about a criminal investigation into that conduct.’

Full Story

Panopticon, 15th May 2020

Source: panopticonblog.com

Government faces legal action over refusal to publish Sage minutes – The Guardian

‘A millionaire businessman is launching legal action against the government after it refused to disclose minutes of the Sage meetings that informed its decision to impose the coronavirus lockdown.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 16th May 2020

Source: www.theguardian.com

Covid-19 and Suspended Sentences – A Court of Appeal Judgment: R v Christopher Manning [2020] EWCA Crim 592 – St Philips Barristers

‘While the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor have announced that jury trials will commence this month, we are far from the pandemic’s conclusion. This fear is felt all the more by defendants facing sentencing hearings. Regardless of whether an offence was committed prior to the crisis, or in the currency, it does not change the new threat that an immediate custodial sentence brings – one of health.’

Full Story

St Philips Barristers, 13th May 2020

Source: st-philips.com

Presence of shielding QC at in-person hearing “not essential” – Legal Futures

‘The physical presence in a sensitive family case of leading counsel shielding from Covid-19 was desirable but “not essential”, a High Court judge has ruled in ordering an in-person hearing.’

Full Story

Legal Futures, 18th May 2020

Source: www.legalfutures.co.uk

The Service Justice System under question regarding the continuation of the jurisdiction to investigate and conduct trials in serious sexual assault and rape cases – Thomas More Chambers

‘The Centre for Military Justice, acting on behalf of three female service personnel has sent a pre – action protocol letter to the Ministry of Defence with regard to three cases which the service justice system (SJS) has conducted and their assertion appears to be that these victims were discriminated against. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) response is due this week. We have not seen the letter nor do we expect to see the response. The Centre for Military Justice stating publicly that by the end of the month they will issue proceedings in the High Court for Judicial Review (JR) citing action for discrimination under both the Human Rights Act and Equality Act. We await sight of the claim and then the defence.’

Full Story

Thomas More Chambers, 14th May 2020

Source: www.thomasmore.co.uk

Protecting our young – ensuring our future – Counsel

Posted May 18th, 2020 in barristers, coronavirus, courts, health, health & safety, news, young persons by sally

‘Young barristers want to be in court but they do not want this at the expense of their health or the expense of their clients, writes Katherine Duncan.’

Full Story

Counsel, May 2020

Source: www.counselmagazine.co.uk

Making defendants state nationality is ‘racialising’ UK courts – report – The Guardian

‘The impartiality of the criminal justice system is being undermined by the requirement that defendants declare their nationality at the start of proceedings, a report into the legislation has said.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 18th May 2020

Source: www.theguardian.com

Coronavirus: 14,000 lockdown-breach fines imposed – BBC News

‘Police in England and Wales have issued more than 14,000 fines for alleged breaches of lockdown laws.’

Full Story

BBC News, 15th May 2020

Source: www.bbc.com

Recent Statutory Instruments – legislation.gov.uk

Posted May 18th, 2020 in legislation by tracey

The Statutory Sick Pay (Coronavirus) (Funding of Employers’ Liabilities) Regulations 2020

Source: www.legislation.gov.uk

BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted May 18th, 2020 in law reports by tracey

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Mohamed v Breish & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 637 (15 May 2020)

Moss v Information Commissioner [2020] EWCA Civ 580 (15 May 2020)

ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2020] EWCA Civ 611 (15 May 2020)

Super Max Offshore Holdings v Malhotra [2020] EWCA Civ 641 (15 May 2020)

High Court (Administrative Court)

QX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 1221 (Admin) (15 May 2020)

Seton, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 1161 (Admin) (15 May 2020)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Mackay v Wesley [2020] EWHC 1215 (Ch) (18 May 2020)

Christoforou v Christoforou & Anor [2020] EWHC 1196 (Ch) (15 May 2020)

Swan & Ors v Gibbs & Ors [2020] EWHC 1226 (Ch) (15 May 2020)

Rees v 82 Portland Place Investments LLP & Anor [2020] EWHC 1177 (Ch) (15 May 2020)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Chubb Seguros Brasil SA [2020] EWHC 1223 (Comm) (15 May 2020)

The Public Institution for Social Security v Amouzegar [2020] EWHC 1220 (Comm) (15 May 2020)

Burford Capital Ltd v London Stock Exchange Group Plc [2020] EWHC 1183 (Comm) (15 May 2020)

High Court (Family Division)

A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1233 (Fam) (15 May 2020)

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Sheianov v Sarner International Ltd [2020] EWHC 1214 (QB) (15 May 2020)

Elu v Floorweald Ltd [2020] EWHC 1222 (QB) (15 May 2020)

Source: www.bailii.org