Erlam and others v Rahman and another [2014] EWHC 2766 (Admin); [2014] WLR (D) 374
‘Non-compliance with the requirement in rule 4(1) of the Election Petition Rules 1960 for “setting out with sufficient particularity the facts relied on” did not render the petition a nullity, or compel its dismissal; the court had power under the CPR or its inherent jurisdiction to order the provision of further particulars to remedy the default.’
WLR Daily, 7th August 2014
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
