“The UK Supreme Court has asked the EU’s highest court to rule on whether the temporary copies that computers make to allow material to be read online breach copyright laws.”
OUT-LAW.com, 17th April 2013
Source: www.out-law.com
The draft Anti-social Behaviour Bill: pre-legislative scrutiny, Cm 8607 (PDF)
Wild Animals in Circuses, Cm 8538 (PDF)
National Minimum Wage, Cm 8565 (PDF)
Human Rights and Democracy: The 2012 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Report, Cm 8593 (PDF)
Independent Police Complaints Commission, Cm 8598 (PDF)
Source: www.official-documents.gov.uk
“The increasing use emergency legislation, lack of adequate debating time and insertion of last-minute amendments are preventing effective parliamentary scrutiny of new laws, a committee has said.”
The Guardian, 15th April 2013
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Cosford & Ors v R [2013] EWCA Crim 466 (16 April 2013)
Cairns v R [2013] EWCA Crim 467 (16 April 2013)
Morris v R [2013] EWCA Crim 436 (16 April 2013)
Khan & Ors v R [2013] EWCA Crim 468 (16 April 2013)
Foran v R [2013] EWCA Crim 437 (16 April 2013)
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Obiorah v London Borough of Lewisham [2013] EWCA Civ 325 (12 April 2013)
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Smith v Dha [2013] EWHC 838 (QB) (12 April 2013)
Ecclestone v Medway NHS Foundation Trust [2013] EWHC 790 (QB) (12 April 2013)
High Court (Administrative Court)
CF v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 843 (Admin) (12 April 2013)
Dr EY v General Medical Council [2013] EWHC 860 (Admin) (15 April 2013)
High Court (Chancery Division)
HSBC Bank v Tambrook Jersey Ltd [2013] EWHC 866 (Ch) (12 April 2013)
High Court (Family Division)
FT and NT (Children), Re [2013] EWHC 850 (Fam) (11 April 2013)
DW (A Minor) & Anor v SG [2013] EWHC 854 (Fam) (12 April 2013)
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
Murray & Anor v Neil Dowlman Architecture Ltd [2013] EWHC 872 (TCC) (16 April 2013)
West & Anor v Ian Finlay & Associates (A Firm) [2013] EWHC 868 (TCC) (16 April 2013)
Lazari v London & Newcastle (Camden) Ltd [2013] EWHC 812 (TCC) (15 April 2013)
Manolete Partners Plc v Hastings Borough Council [20131 EWHC 842 (TCC) (12 April 2013)
High Court (Commercial Court)
FXCM Securities v Digby [2013] EWHC 762 (Comm) (15 February 2013)
High Court (Patents Court)
Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/S [2013] EWHC 739 (Pat) (12 April 2013)
Source: www.bailii.org
“A City banker was ‘victimised’ by her bank after it discovered she was suing her former employer for sexual discrimination, a tribunal has ruled. Latifa Bouabdillah was sacked by Commerzbank after less than a month when her boss heard she was suing her former employer, Deutsche Bank, for more than £1m in damages for sexual discrimination.”
The Guardian, 15th April 2013
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
“Following the announcement in June 2012 by the Financial Services Authority of a two month investigation in to the sale (and in particular mis-selling) of interest rate hedging products such as swaps, collars, structured collars there is considerable interest in whether such claims are likely, following Payment Protection Insurance, to become another key battleground in financial services litigation.”
No. 5 Chambers, 7th February 2013
Source: www.no5.com
“The Court of Protection has jurisdiction over the property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity to make decisions for themselves. Among its various roles the Court is responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of enduring powers of attorney (“EPA”), and Lasting Powers of Attorney (‘LPA’), appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.”
No. 5 Chambers, 4th February 2013
Source: www.no5.com
“It is a common problem with assured shorthold tenancies of a flat or a house. An unscrupulous landlord takes a deposit from a tenant and then, at the end of the tenancy, refuses to return the deposit on some largely trumped up basis. In effect the landlord challenges the tenant to sue him for return of the deposit. The sums involved are important to the tenant losing them, but in reality are so small that the time and money required to recover them through the Courts is disproportionate. The landlord gets a windfall.”
Hardwicke Chambers, 15th April 2013
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
“What are the duties of an Employee who is approached by a family member to supply goods or services to his Employer?”
No. 5 Chambers, 18th March 2013
Source: www.no5.com
“The duty that local authorities have to accommodate homeless applicants in priority need is well established. But that duty, in section 193 of the Housing Act 1996, ceases to apply if a homeless applicant refuses to accept accommodation which is suitable for them.”
Hardwicke Chambers, 12th April 2013
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
“Fatim Kurji considers the European Court of Human Rights’ verdict in the case of Eweida & Others v The United Kingdom [2013] IRLR 231.”
No. 5 Chambers, 18th March 2013
Source: www.no5.com
“Last year I discussed Mr Justice Flaux’s decision in Graiseley Properties Limited and others v Barclays Bank plc [2012] EWHC 3093 (Comm) (see Littleton Comment on 4 December 2012). In that case Flaux J. had allowed amendments to plead fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of implied terms in relation to LIBOR which smoothed the path to claims which were, in essence, that the Bank had sold LIBOR-related products when it knew that its employees were attempting to ‘rig’ LIBOR rates for their own purposes (i.e. making their trades profitable) and that such conduct would disadvantage clients who relied on the Bank not attempting to manipulate LIBOR rates. Although I pointed out that allowing the amendments, which lacked the particularity to be expected, was unusual, I also observed that ‘This is a welcome and realistic approach to the difficulties faced by customers in claims against banks.'”
Littleton Chambers, 15th April 2013
Source: www.littletonchambers.com
“In February 2011 the Home Office produced the consultation document ‘More Effective Responses to Anti-Social Behaviour’ – a response to the earlier document ‘The Coalition: our programme for government’.”
Hardwicke Chambers, 12th April 2013
Source: www.hardwicke.co.uk
“On April 1 cuts of £350 million from the legal aid budget of £2.1 billion came into effect.”
Garden Court Chambers Blog, 16th April 2013
Source: www.gclaw.wordpress.com
“Virgin Media has won a victory against fledgling rival YouView, getting its launch TV and press campaign banned after the advertising watchdog ruled that claims it is ‘unique’ and the ‘easiest’ service were untrue.”
The Guardian, 17th April 2013
Source: www.guardian.co.uk
“The requirement that a foreign spouse or partner of a British citizen or person settled in the United Kingdom produce a test certificate of knowledge of the English language to a prescribed standard prior to entering the United Kingdom was proportionate.”
WLR Daily, 12th April 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“The funding of a client’s disbursements by a solicitor did not, without more, justify the making of an adverse costs order against that solicitor.”
WLR Daily, 10th April 2013
Source: www.iclr.co.uk
“Courts can calculate trade mark infringement damages based on a hypothetical licensing arrangement, the High Court has said.”
OUT-LAW.com, 17th April 2013
Source: www.out-law.com
© Inner Temple Library 2024