Day: 22 February 2010

High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)

Garside v Black Horse Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 190 (QB) (12 February 2010)

Pankhurst v White [2010] EWHC 311 (QB) (18 February 2010)

Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc [2010] EWHC 302 (QB) (19 February 2010)

Sabin v BRB (Residuary) Ltd [2010] EWHC 267 (QB) (19 February 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Thomas & Anor v BPE Solicitors (A Firm) [2010] EWHC 306 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Sharp & Ors [2010] EWHC 268 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

High Court (Administrative Court)

James v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 282 (Admin) (19 February 2010)

Peake v Director of Public Prosecution [2010] EWHC 286 (Admin) (19 February 2010)

The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner & Ors [2010] EWHC 285 (Admin) (19 February 2010)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Eribo & Anor v Odinaiya & Anor [2010] EWHC 301 (TCC) (19 February 2010)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Linsen International Ltd & Ors v Humpuss Sea Transport PTE Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 303 (Comm) (19 February 2010)

Source: www.bailii.org

Regina v Ramchurn

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Judicial Studies Board specimen directions provided guidance for trial judges but were not authority binding them unless approved or adopted by the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division.”

The Times, 22nd February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina v Valentas; Regina v Tabus

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

“Until there was a definite guideline issued by the Sentencing Council, proposals of the Sentencing Advisory Panel did not constitute guidance to sentencers which displaced guideline decisions of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division.”

The Times, 22nd February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Regina v Carter (David)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division

“If a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage in the trial, the judge was not required to direct the remaining members of the jury to ignore any views expressed by the juror who had departed.”

The Times, 22nd February 2010

Source: www.timesonline.co.uk

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Muhammed v R [2010] EWCA Crim 227 (19 February 2010)

Azam & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 226 (19 February 2010)

Thames Water Utilities Ltd, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 202 (19 February 2010)

Moore, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 224 (19 February 2010)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Al Dawood Shipping Lines Ltd v Dynastic Maritime Inc (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 104 (19 February 2010)

WL (Congo) 1 and 2 & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 111 (19 February 2010)

High Court (Chancery Division)

Winwood & Anor (Trustees of the E.E.Marsh Land Settlement) v Biffa Waste Services Ltdo & Anor [2010] EWHC 242 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Nanjing Automobile (Group) Corporation & Ors v MG Sports and Racing Europe Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 270 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Crest Nicholson (Londinium) Ltd v Akaria Investments Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 243 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

Re Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd [2010] EWHC 316 (Ch) (19 February 2010)

High Court (Family Division)

Z, Re [2009] EWHC 3621 (Fam) (21 December 2009)

Source: www.bailii.org