BAILII: Recent Decisions

Posted July 30th, 2026 in law reports by michael

Supreme Court

R v Sheikh and others [2026] UKSC 28 (27 July 2026)

AXA Insurance UK PLC and another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another [2026] UKSC 24 (27 July 2026)

The Kingdom of Bahrain v Shehabi and another [2026] UKSC 25 (27 July 2026)

Tesla, Inc and another v InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc and others; Tesla, Inc and others v InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc and another No 2 [2026] UKSC 27 (27 July 2026)

Akbars Restaurant (Middlesborough) Limited v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] UKSC 26 (27 July 2026)

Valeriy Ernestovich Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC (In Liquidation in the Russian Federation) [2026] UKSC 29 (27 July 2026)

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)

Secretary of State for the Home Department v Hirtie [2026] EWCA Civ 1000 (30 July 2026)

S-O (Children), Re (Relocation and Prohibited Steps Order) [2026] EWCA Civ 998 (30 July 2026)

Faraj v Ahmad & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 977 (30 July 2026)

Tasib, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 996 (29 July 2026)

Meta Platforms Inc & Ors v Gormsen [2026] EWCA Civ 993 (29 July 2026)

Bridgen v Hancock [2026] EWCA Civ 991 (29 July 2026)

Crabb & Ors v TUI Airways Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 988 (29 July 2026)

The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London v 48th Street Holdings Ltd & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 970 (29 July 2026)

F (Children: Placement Orders: Proportionality) [2026] EWCA Civ 990 (29 July 2026)

J (Children), In the Matter Of [2026] EWCA Civ 989 (29 July 2026)

FD, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 999 (29 July 2026)

Evans & Anor v Swansea Building Society [2026] EWCA Civ 978 (28 July 2026)

Titanium Capital Investment Ltd & Anor v Jonathan Hughes & Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 976 (28 July 2026)

Lufthansa Technik AG v Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems & Anor [2026] EWCA Civ 964 (27 July 2026)

Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Jamal & Ors v R. [2026] EWCA Crim 951 (28 July 2026)

Osmond, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 979 (28 July 2026)

High Court (Administrative Court)

Staunch Campaign Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v North Northamptonshire Council [2026] EWHC 1962 (Admin) (30 July 2026)

Daniel’s Special Care Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 1979 (Admin) (30 July 2026)

Khan v The Nursing and Midwifery Council [2026] EWHC 1975 (Admin) (30 July 2026)

HUR, R (On the Application Of) v Royal Borough of Greenwich [2026] EWHC 1978 (Admin) (30 July 2026)

Olaifa, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley [2026] EWHC 1945 (Admin) (29 July 2026)

Wild Justice & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Natural England (No.3) [2026] EWHC 1932 (Admin) (28 July 2026)

Gajar v Pecs Regional Court, Hungary [2026] EWHC 1903 (Admin) (27 July 2026)

Asiedu-Baning v Nursing And Midwifery Council [2026] EWHC 1936 (Admin) (27 July 2026)

Guardians of Whitewebbs Park Cic, R (On the Application Of) v Tottenham Hotspur Football Company Ltd [2026] EWHC 1916 (Admin) (27 July 2026)

High Court (Chancery Division)

QuidPay Finance Ltd v SettleGo Solutions Ltd (t/a OpenPayd) [2026] EWHC 1991 (Ch) (30 July 2026)

NW Publishing UK Ltd v Newsweek Publishing LLC [2026] EWHC 1882 (Ch) (30 July 2026)

Aitsan Ltd & Ors v Duffy & Anor [2026] EWHC 1993 (Ch) (30 July 2026)

Gamett v Hughes & Anor [2026] EWHC 2004 (Ch) (30 July 2026)

Competition and Markets Authority v Emma Matratzen GMBH & Ors [2026] EWHC 1995 (Ch) (30 July 2026)

Mitchell & Anor v Al Jaber & Ors [2026] EWHC 1947 (Ch) (29 July 2026)

Importers Service Corporation & Anor v Aliotta & Ors [2026] EWHC 1969 (Ch) (29 July 2026)

Finnan v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2026] EWHC 1940 (Ch) (28 July 2026)

Hasbro Consumer Products Licensing Ltd & Anor v Cong Ty Tnhh Dau Tu Cong Nghe Va Dich Vu Sconnect Viet Nam (aka SConnect Co Ltd) & Ors (Re Consequentials) [2026] EWHC 1957 (Ch) (27 July 2026)

Stanford v Klotho Brands Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 1917 (Ch) (27 July 2026)

Nvayo Ltd, Re [2026] EWHC 1927 (Ch) (27 July 2026)

High Court (Commercial Court)

Yello Voice Solutions Ltd v Onecom Partners Ltd [2026] EWHC 1856 (Comm) (30 July 2026)

Trafigura PTE Ltd v Societe Nationale de Raffinage [2026] EWHC 1914 (Comm) (30 July 2026)

IPJSC United Company Rusal v Whiteleave Holdings Ltd & Ors [2026] EWHC 1982 (Comm) (28 July 2026)

High Court (Patents Court)

Acer Inc & Anor v Nokia Technologies OY [2026] EWHC 1939 (Pat) (28 July 2026)

High Court (King’s Bench Division)

KHX v Isle of Wight Council [2026] EWHC 1949 (KB) (30 July 2026)

AG Retail Num (6) Ltd v Andron Contract Services Ltd [2026] EWHC 1951 (KB) (30 July 2026)

Janet D’Sa v Hammersmith and Fulham Council [2026] EWHC 2015 (KB) (30 July 2026)

Hossain & Ors v The Home Office (No. 2) [2026] EWHC 1989 (KB) (30 July 2026)

HSX v Ryan & Ors [2026] EWHC 1985 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Mktrchyan v 2TROM Media Group Ltd & Anor [2026] EWHC 1923 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Cadogan t/a Ebonycare & Ors v London Borough of Haringey [2026] EWHC 1972 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Maidstone Borough Council v King [2026] EWHC 1965 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Gallagher Benefit Services Management Company Ltd v Meagher [2026] EWHC 1966 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Winehouse v Parry & Anor [2026] EWHC 1970 (KB) (29 July 2026)

Breeze & Anor v Chief Constable of Norfolk Constabulary (Rev1) [2026] EWHC 1937 (KB) (28 July 2026)

Premium Contractor Solution LLC v Kang [2026] EWHC 2014 (KB) (27 July 2026)

Gojikian v North London NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2026] EWHC 1941 (KB) (27 July 2026)

Humphries v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary & Anor [2026] EWHC 1928 (KB) (27 July 2026)

Cavell v Centaur Construction Ltd [2026] EWHC 1875 (KB) (24 July 2026)

Aerotron Ltd v Hermes Aviation Ltd [2026] EWHC 1879 (KB) (23 July 2026)

High Court (Technology and Construction Court)

Durkan Estates Ltd v Wallace Estates Ltd [2026] EWHC 2003 (TCC) (30 July 2026)

Oakland Wantage Care Home Ltd v Stepnell Ltd [2026] EWHC 1530 (TCC) (23 June 2026)

Source: www.bailii.org

Serial killer given whole life orders for murdering two men – BBC News

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘Serial killer James Desborough has been given two whole life prison sentences with no chance of parole – as police revealed they are looking into four unexplained deaths at the homeless shelter that housed him.’

Full Story

BBC News, 29th July 2026

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Corporate Criminal Liability- Clarity or Confusion? – Red Lion Chambers

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by Lily

‘Corporate criminal liability has changed. In the July edition of FOCUS, Leo Seelig and Katie Bacon unpack the impact of section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026, examining what this landmark reform means for businesses and those advising them.’

Full Story

Red Lion Chambers, 17th July 2026

Source: redlionchambers.co.uk

Investment mandation and members’ “best interests” – Pensions Barrister

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘Zara Yusuf of Three Stone considers the Pension Schemes Act 2026’s investment mandation power and asks what the Stena Line case can tell us about its new “best interests” safeguard.’

Full Story

Pensions Barrister, 30th July 2026

Source: www.pensionsbarrister.com

UK government reviews why police ceding criminal cases to US military – The Guardian

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘The UK government and police chiefs are reviewing the process through which US military personnel accused of committing serious crimes on UK soil are avoiding the British justice system.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 30th July 2026

Source: www.theguardian.com

Inquiry finds MoD Afghan data breach was foreseeable failure – BBC News

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘A data breach that exposed personal details of thousands of Afghans applying to come to the UK to flee the Taliban was a “foreseeable” failure, a parliamentary inquiry has found.’

Full Story

BBC News, 30th July 2026

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

High Court grants permission to house builders for challenge over Article 31 order by Transport Secretary on development site – Local Government Lawyer

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by Lily

‘A High Court judge has taken the unusual step of explaining his reasons for granting permission for a judicial review to a group of house builders, who wish to challenge the Secretary of State for Transport over the use of a site in Warrington.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 30th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Court of Appeal order brings end to decade-long planning dispute over site of photography studio – Local Government Lawyer

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by Lily

‘One of the longest running planning disputes to come before the courts has ended with victory for a developer.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 30th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Libel claim against Matt Hancock thrown out – BBC News

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘A libel case against former Health Secretary Matt Hancock has been thrown out at the Court of Appeal.’

Full Story

BBC News, 29th July 2026

Source: www.bbc.co.uk

Judge orders Amy Winehouse’s father to pay nearly £1m to her friends – The Guardian

Posted July 30th, 2026 in news by sally

‘The father of British music sensation Amy Winehouse has been ordered to pay £950,000 (US$1.26m, A$1.82m) to his late daughter’s friends, who he unsuccessfully sued for auctioning the singer’s clothes and other items.’

Full Story

The Guardian, 30th July 2026

Source: www.theguardian.com

Another Piece in the Jigsaw: Non-domestic Rate Liability for Unoccupied Commercial Property Despite a CVA. – Radcliffe Chambers

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘Clive Moys recently featured in the June edition of LexisNexis Corporate Rescue and Insolvency for his article, “Another piece in the jigsaw: non-domestic rate liability for unoccupied commercial property despite a CVA.” In this article, Clive examines the Divisional Court’s recent decision in the Robinson Webster (Holdings) Limited (RWHL) appeal and its implications for tenants, landlords and billing authorities.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 15th July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

Administrative Schemes for Charities (2026) Private Client Business – Radcliffe Chambers

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘Matthew Mills has recently published an article in Private Client Business on the jurisdiction to make administrative schemes for charities. The article draws together the key English authorities, including the recent Dasji v Bhudia [2026] EWHC 455 (Ch), and the key Australian decisions. It explains the test for making an administrative scheme, the evidence which the court and the Charity Commission will want to see, the terms which may be included in an administrative scheme, and the future of administrative schemes generally.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 21st July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

Titanium Capital Investments Limited & Anor v Hughes and Ors [2026] EWCA Civ 976 – Radcliffe Chambers

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘The case concerns a partnership founded during the COVID-19 pandemic to sell lateral flow tests (“LFTs”). Following the dissolution of the partnership, both partners continued selling COVID-19 LFTs through different entities, making substantial sums of money.’

Full Story

Radcliffe Chambers, 28th July 2026

Source: radcliffechambers.com

UK competition ‘class actions’ face increased scrutiny – OUT-LAW.com

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘The legal and economic foundations of “class action”-style competition claims are being tested with increased vigour in the UK. The evidence for this view lies in how the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) and appeal courts have scrutinised whether claims, settlements and funding arrangements are proportionate, workable and aligned with class members’ interests in a raft of recent competition collective proceedings. That trend is now unfolding alongside a new UK government consultation on making opt-out collective actions, regulatory appeals and competition enforcement “swifter and simpler”.’

Full Story

OUT-LAW.com, 29th July 2026

Source: www.pinsentmasons.com

Pride displays in workplaces – Local Government Lawyer

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘An Employment Tribunal has recently given its reasons for concluding why pride displays in a workplace were not discriminatory against a claimant’s religious belief or disability. Robin White and Rachel Wall examine the ruling.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

When “encouraged” became “expected”: Prime Way Care and the new disclosure discipline for local authority procurements – Local Government Lawyer

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘Paul Henty examines how the first significant application of the rewritten procurement protocol in the 2026 TCC Guide changes what contracting authorities should expect when faced with a procurement challenge.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

Manifesting protected beliefs: when are my views protected? – Local Government Lawyer

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘In London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Garrett [2026] EAT 77, the employer (“Respondent”) appealed against a decision of the Employment Tribunal (“ET”) which had, by majority, found that the Respondent had directly discriminated against the employee (“Claimant”) on the grounds of belief. The ET also upheld one complaint of direct race discrimination.’

Full Story

Local Government Lawyer, 29th July 2026

Source: www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk

A Fairer End to Relationships? Some Reflections on the Core Principles of the Government’s Proposals to Reform the Law of Financial Remedies on Divorce. – Financial Remedies Journal

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘This piece focuses on the central principles of the proposed reforms to financial remedies law: a starting point of sharing matrimonial property, with the possibility of a departure from an equal division where this is required to meet needs. There are two reasons for this narrow focus. The first is a lack of space to consider every potential issue with the proposed scheme. The second is more pragmatic. Law reform in this area is important. This is particularly true in relation to the law relating to cohabitants, where the current lack of protection is highly problematic, and to the law relating to pre-nuptial agreements where, as Sharon Thompson has convincingly argued, there is a real need for legislative safeguards.’

Full Story

Financial Remedies Journal, 28th July 2026

Source: financialremediesjournal.com

Private Children Law Case Update – Summer 2026 – Pump Court Chambers

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘FAZ v MAZ [2026] EWFC 131. This judgment of Poole J concerned allegations of sexual abuse in private law children proceedings. At the outset Poole J observed, expectedly, that where the court has to determine allegations of sexual abuse of a child by a parent “the stakes are high”.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 13th July 2026

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com

The Invisible Judgment: Why money orders in possession proceedings do not show up as CCJ’s – Pump Court Chambers

Posted July 29th, 2026 in news by michael

‘A client asked me a simple question at court recently: “If the court makes a money order, does that mean they get a CCJ?”

The instinctive answer is “yes”. A County Court money judgment is, in ordinary language, a CCJ. But in possession proceedings the answer is more complicated, and rather odd.’

Full Story

Pump Court Chambers, 15th July 2026

Source: www.pumpcourtchambers.com